» Articles » PMID: 19307518

Meat Intake and Mortality: a Prospective Study of over Half a Million People

Overview
Journal Arch Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Mar 25
PMID 19307518
Citations 182
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High intakes of red or processed meat may increase the risk of mortality. Our objective was to determine the relations of red, white, and processed meat intakes to risk for total and cause-specific mortality.

Methods: The study population included the National Institutes of Health-AARP (formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study cohort of half a million people aged 50 to 71 years at baseline. Meat intake was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire administered at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) within quintiles of meat intake. The covariates included in the models were age, education, marital status, family history of cancer (yes/no) (cancer mortality only), race, body mass index, 31-level smoking history, physical activity, energy intake, alcohol intake, vitamin supplement use, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, and menopausal hormone therapy among women. Main outcome measures included total mortality and deaths due to cancer, cardiovascular disease, injuries and sudden deaths, and all other causes.

Results: There were 47 976 male deaths and 23 276 female deaths during 10 years of follow-up. Men and women in the highest vs lowest quintile of red (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.27-1.35], and HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.30-1.43], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.20], and HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.20-1.31], respectively) intakes had elevated risks for overall mortality. Regarding cause-specific mortality, men and women had elevated risks for cancer mortality for red (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.16-1.29], and HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12-1.30], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.19], and HR, 1.11 [95% CI 1.04-1.19], respectively) intakes. Furthermore, cardiovascular disease risk was elevated for men and women in the highest quintile of red (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.20-1.35], and HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.37-1.65], respectively) and processed meat (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15], and HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.26-1.51], respectively) intakes. When comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of white meat intake, there was an inverse association for total mortality and cancer mortality, as well as all other deaths for both men and women.

Conclusion: Red and processed meat intakes were associated with modest increases in total mortality, cancer mortality, and cardiovascular disease mortality.

Citing Articles

Exploring Predictors of Type 2 Diabetes Within Animal-Sourced and Plant-Based Dietary Patterns with the XGBoost Machine Learning Classifier: NHANES 2013-2016.

Eckart A, Ghimire P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860464 PMC: 11766419. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020458.


Translation and validation of the meat attachment questionnaire (MAQ) in a French general practice population.

Delaunay B, Tudrej B, Bernard A, Dupuy A, Malavergne C, Bacon T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2372.

PMID: 39827192 PMC: 11742934. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86270-x.


Reducing ruminant numbers and consumption of animal source foods are aligned with environmental and public health demands.

Bodirsky B, Pradhan P, Springmann M Landbauforschung (Braunschw). 2024; 69(1):35-30.

PMID: 39664076 PMC: 7617226. DOI: 10.3220/LBF1581688226000.


Reduced red and processed meat consumption is associated with lower diet costs in US households: a national analysis of protein substitutions.

Orta-Aleman D, Thorne-Lyman A, Neff R, Wolfson J, Caulfield L Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e205.

PMID: 39385430 PMC: 11604326. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001897.


Burden of ischemic stroke attributable to a high red meat diet in China, 1990-2019: analysis based on the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study.

Jin S, Xia K, Sun B, Xie L, Zhang H Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1384023.

PMID: 38912303 PMC: 11191671. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1384023.


References
1.
Lee D, Jacobs Jr D, Folsom A . A hypothesis: interaction between supplemental iron intake and fermentation affecting the risk of colon cancer. The Iowa Women's Health Study. Nutr Cancer. 2004; 48(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327914nc4801_1. View

2.
Appleby P, Thorogood M, Mann J, Key T . The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 70(3 Suppl):525S-531S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.525s. View

3.
Hughes R, Cross A, Pollock J, Bingham S . Dose-dependent effect of dietary meat on endogenous colonic N-nitrosation. Carcinogenesis. 2001; 22(1):199-202. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.1.199. View

4.
Key T, Fraser G, Thorogood M, Appleby P, Beral V, Reeves G . Mortality in vegetarians and non-vegetarians: a collaborative analysis of 8300 deaths among 76,000 men and women in five prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 1(1):33-41. DOI: 10.1079/phn19980006. View

5.
Midthune D, Kipnis V, Freedman L, Carroll R . Binary regression in truncated samples, with application to comparing dietary instruments in a large prospective study. Biometrics. 2007; 64(1):289-98. PMC: 2714946. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00833.x. View