Computation of Mean Size is Based on Perceived Size
Overview
Psychology
Authors
Affiliations
The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.
The Effect of Size Statistics of the Background Texture on Perceived Target Size.
Wu C, Chen C Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):10963.
PMID: 30026497 PMC: 6053386. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29168-1.
The time-limited visual statistician.
Attarha M, Moore C, Vecera S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016; 42(10):1497-504.
PMID: 27336630 PMC: 6999819. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000255.
Knol H, Huys R, Sarrazin J, Jirsa V Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1679.
PMID: 26583002 PMC: 4631937. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01679.
The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.
Attarha M, Moore C J Vis. 2015; 15(4):9.
PMID: 26360153 PMC: 4679208. DOI: 10.1167/15.4.9.
The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.
Attarha M, Moore C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015; 77(4):1116-31.
PMID: 25810160 PMC: 4417065. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0870-0.