» Articles » PMID: 19302393

Use of a New Cross-linked Collagen Membrane for the Treatment of Dehiscence-type Defects at Titanium Implants: a Prospective, Randomized-controlled Double-blinded Clinical Multicenter Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Mar 24
PMID 19302393
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study was to assess the use of either a new cross-linked (VN) or a native collagen membrane (BG) for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants.

Material And Methods: A total of n=54 patients were recruited in four German university clinics. According to a parallel-groups design, dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants were filled with a natural bone mineral and randomly assigned to either VN or BG. Submerged sites were allowed to heal for 4 months. Primary (e.g., changes in defect length - DeltaDL, quality of newly formed tissue [0-4] - TQ) and secondary parameters (e.g., membrane exposure, tissue conditions at dehisced sites) were consecutively recorded.

Results: Four patients were excluded due to an early wound infection (VN:3; BG:1), and one patient was lost during follow-up (VN). The mean DeltaDL was 3.0 +/- 2.5 mm in the VN, and 1.94 +/- 2.13 mm in the BG group. The assessment of TQ revealed comparable mean values in both groups (VN: 3.05 +/- 1.66, BG: 3.46 +/- 1.48). A significant correlation between membrane exposure and inflammation of the adjacent soft tissue was observed in the VN group. In both groups, the mean DL and TQ values were not significantly different at either non-exposed or exposed implant sites.

Conclusion: The results of the present study have indicated that VN supported bone regeneration on a level non-inferior to BG. However, in case of a premature membrane exposure, cross-linking might impair soft-tissue healing or may even cause wound infections.

Citing Articles

The influence of different crosslinking agents onto the physical properties, integration behavior and immune response of collagen-based barrier membranes.

Ren Y, Alkildani S, Burckhardt K, Kowitsch A, Radenkovic M, Stojanovic S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1506433.

PMID: 39834629 PMC: 11743487. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1506433.


Effect of Membrane Fixation and the Graft Combinations on Horizontal Bone Regeneration: Radiographic and Histologic Outcomes in a Canine Model.

Paik J, Kwon Y, Park J, Jung R, Jung U, Thoma D Biomater Res. 2024; 28:0055.

PMID: 39076892 PMC: 11284130. DOI: 10.34133/bmr.0055.


Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model.

Lee H, Hong J, Shin S, Herr Y, Lim H, Chung J J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024; 54(5):359-373.

PMID: 38725426 PMC: 11543332. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2400240012.


Collagen-Based Medical Devices for Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.

Abedi M, Shafiee M, Afshari F, Mohammadi H, Ghasemi Y Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2023; 196(8):5563-5603.

PMID: 38133881 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04793-3.


Systematic evaluation of three porcine-derived collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration.

Tai A, Landao-Bassonga E, Chen Z, Tran M, Allan B, Ruan R Biomater Transl. 2023; 4(1):41-50.

PMID: 37206304 PMC: 10189808. DOI: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2023.01.006.