» Articles » PMID: 19289310

Performing Two DIEP Flaps in a Working Day: an Achievable and Reproducible Practice

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2009 Mar 18
PMID 19289310
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is a reliable technique for autologous breast reconstruction, the meticulous dissection of perforators may require lengthy operative times. In our unit, we have performed 600 free flaps for breast reconstruction over 8 years and have reduced operative times with a combination of preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA), various anastomotic techniques and the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler probe for perfusion monitoring. We sought to assess the feasibility of performing two DIEP flaps within the working hours of a single day.

Methods: A review of 101 consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction in a 12-month period was performed, comparing one DIEP flap per day (n=43) to two DIEP flaps per day (n=58). Complications, outcomes and techniques used were critically analysed. For cases of two DIEP flaps per day, a comparison was made between the use of two separate operating theatres (n=44) and a single consecutive theatre (n=14).

Results: Complications did not increase when two DIEP flaps were performed in a single working day. The use of vascular closure staple (VCS) sutures and ring couplers resulted in statistically significant reductions in anastomotic times. The use of two separate theatres for performing two DIEP flaps resulted in a reduction of 59min in operative time per case (p=0.004).

Conclusion: Two DIEP flaps can be safely and routinely performed within the hours of a single working day. By minimising operative times, these techniques can improve productivity and substantially decrease surgeon fatigue.

Citing Articles

Establishing a Microsurgical Practice in a Limited Resource African Setting: The Kapsowar Hospital Experience.

Rhodes I, Arbuiso S, Alston C, Zhang A, Medina S, Liao M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(12):e6390.

PMID: 39712377 PMC: 11661720. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006390.


Complications in Prolonged Intraoperative Ischemia Time in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Arellano J, Comerci A, Liu H, Alessandri Bonetti M, Nguyen V, Parent B Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39322841 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04382-7.


The first 150 consecutive DIEP free flaps: Lessons learnt and a guide to efficiency for the junior plastic surgeon.

Thakur I, Shepherd H, Soliman B JPRAS Open. 2024; 41:336-346.

PMID: 39188657 PMC: 11345896. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.014.


A clinical practice review on process efficiency in autologous breast reconstruction.

Haddock N, Facchin F, Teotia S Gland Surg. 2023; 12(7):1007-1015.

PMID: 37727338 PMC: 10506120. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-680.


Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: The Learning Curve at a Breast Reconstruction Center and a Single-Surgeon Study.

Varnava C, Wiebringhaus P, Hirsch T, Dermietzel A, Kueckelhaus M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37109230 PMC: 10140818. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082894.