Event-related Potentials Reveal Temporal Staging of Dynamic Facial Expression and Gaze Shift Effects on Attentional Orienting

Overview

Journal Soc Neurosci

Publisher Routledge

Date 2009 Mar 11

PMID 19274577

Citations 23

Authors

Harlan M Fichtenholtz

Joseph B Hopfinger

Reiko Graham

Jacqueline M Detwiler

Kevin S LaBar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Multiple sources of information from the face guide attention during social interaction. The present study modified the Posner cueing paradigm to investigate how dynamic changes in emotional expression and eye gaze in faces affect the neural processing of subsequent target stimuli. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants viewed centrally presented face displays in which gaze direction (left, direct, right) and facial expression (fearful, neutral) covaried in a fully crossed design. Gaze direction was not predictive of peripheral target location. ERP analysis revealed several sequential effects, including: (1) an early enhancement of target processing following fearful faces (P1); (2) an interaction between expression and gaze (N1), with enhanced target processing following fearful faces with rightward gaze; and (3) an interaction between gaze and target location (P3), with enhanced processing for invalidly cued left visual field targets. Behaviorally, participants responded faster to targets following fearful faces and targets presented in the right visual field, in concordance with the P1 and N1 effects, respectively. The findings indicate that two nonverbal social cues-facial expression and gaze direction-modulate attentional orienting across different temporal stages of processing. Results have implications for understanding the mental chronometry of shared attention and social referencing.

Citing Articles

Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict processing and gaze-cueing.

Hoffmann S, Fischer R, Liepelt R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15286.

PMID: 37223118 PMC: 10202105. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15286.

No Influence of Emotional Faces or Autistic Traits on Gaze-Cueing in General Population.

Uono S, Egashira Y, Hayashi S, Takada M, Ukezono M, Okada T Front Psychol. 2022; 13:864116.

PMID: 35558687 PMC: 9088812. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864116.

The Neurobiological Correlates of Gaze Perception in Healthy Individuals and Neurologic Patients.

Battaglia S, Fabius J, Moravkova K, Fracasso A, Borgomaneri S Biomedicines. 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35327431 PMC: 8945205. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10030627.

Akturk T, de Graaf T, Abra Y, Sahoglu-Goktas S, Ozkan D, Kula A Biomed Eng Online. 2021; 20(1):41.

PMID: 33906649 PMC: 8077950. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-021-00882-8.

The Gaze Cueing Effect and Its Enhancement by Facial Expressions Are Impacted by Task Demands: Direct Comparison of Target Localization and Discrimination Tasks.

Chen Z, McCrackin S, Morgan A, Itier R Front Psychol. 2021; 12:618606.

PMID: 33790836 PMC: 8006310. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618606.

References

Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F . The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 80(3):381-96. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381. View

Friesen C, Moore C, Kingstone A . Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention?. Brain Cogn. 2005; 57(1):66-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.025. View

Tomonaga M . Is chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spatial attention reflexively triggered by gaze cue?. J Comp Psychol. 2007; 121(2):156-70. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.156. View

Heinze H, Mangun G, Burchert W, Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Munte T . Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature. 1994; 372(6506):543-6. DOI: 10.1038/372543a0. View

Field T, Woodson R, Greenberg R, Cohen D . Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science. 1982; 218(4568):179-81. DOI: 10.1126/science.7123230. View

Friesen C, Ristic J, Kingstone A . Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004; 30(2):319-29. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.319. View

Schuller A, Rossion B . Spatial attention triggered by eye gaze enhances and speeds up visual processing in upper and lower visual fields beyond early striate visual processing. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116(11):2565-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.021. View

Holmes A, Vuilleumier P, Eimer M . The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 16(2):174-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9. View

Tomasello M, Hare B, Lehmann H, Call J . Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. J Hum Evol. 2006; 52(3):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.10.001. View

10.

Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles R, Pichler A, Dutton K . Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?. Cogn Emot. 2007; 14(1):61-92. PMC: 1839771. DOI: 10.1080/026999300378996. View

11.

Hugdahl K, Nordby H . Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities. Behav Neural Biol. 1994; 62(1):21-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(05)80055-x. View

12.

Emery N, Lorincz E, Perrett D, Oram M, Baker C . Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol. 1997; 111(3):286-93. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.3.286. View

13.

Pecchinenda A, Pes M, Ferlazzo F, Zoccolotti P . The combined effect of gaze direction and facial expression on cueing spatial attention. Emotion. 2008; 8(5):628-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0013437. View

14.

Friesen C, Kingstone A . Covert and overt orienting to gaze direction cues and the effects of fixation offset. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(3):489-93. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200303030-00039. View

15.

Putman P, Hermans E, van Honk J . Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze. Emotion. 2006; 6(1):94-102. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.94. View

16.

Schuller A, Rossion B . Perception of static eye gaze direction facilitates subsequent early visual processing. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(5):1161-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.022. View

17.

Woldorff M, Hazlett C, Fichtenholtz H, Weissman D, Dale A, Song A . Functional parcellation of attentional control regions of the brain. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(1):149-65. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322755638. View

18.

Nelson C, Horowitz F . The perception of facial expressions and stimulus motion by two- and five-month-old infants using holographic stimuli. Child Dev. 1983; 54(4):868-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb00508.x. View

19.

Whalen P, Shin L, McInerney S, Fischer H, Wright C, Rauch S . A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger. Emotion. 2003; 1(1):70-83. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.70. View

20.

Ristic J, Kingstone A . Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition. 2004; 94(3):B55-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.005. View