» Articles » PMID: 27959925

Emotion Unchained: Facial Expression Modulates Gaze Cueing Under Cognitive Load

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Dec 14
PMID 27959925
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Direction of eye gaze cues spatial attention, and typically this cueing effect is not modulated by the expression of a face unless top-down processes are explicitly or implicitly involved. To investigate the role of cognitive control on gaze cueing by emotional faces, participants performed a gaze cueing task with happy, angry, or neutral faces under high (i.e., counting backward by 7) or low cognitive load (i.e., counting forward by 2). Results show that high cognitive load enhances gaze cueing effects for angry facial expressions. In addition, cognitive load reduces gaze cueing for neutral faces, whereas happy facial expressions and gaze affected object preferences regardless of load. This evidence clearly indicates a differential role of cognitive control in processing gaze direction and facial expression, suggesting that under typical conditions, when we shift attention based on social cues from another person, cognitive control processes are used to reduce interference from emotional information.

Citing Articles

Cultural differences in joint attention and engagement in mutual gaze with a robot face.

Marchesi S, Abubshait A, Kompatsiari K, Wu Y, Wykowska A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11689.

PMID: 37468517 PMC: 10356937. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38704-7.


Valence moderates the effect of stimulus-hand proximity on conflict processing and gaze-cueing.

Hoffmann S, Fischer R, Liepelt R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15286.

PMID: 37223118 PMC: 10202105. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15286.


Wearing the face mask affects our social attention over space.

Villani C, DAscenzo S, Scerrati E, Ricciardelli P, Nicoletti R, Lugli L Front Psychol. 2022; 13:923558.

PMID: 35992481 PMC: 9386249. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923558.


No Influence of Emotional Faces or Autistic Traits on Gaze-Cueing in General Population.

Uono S, Egashira Y, Hayashi S, Takada M, Ukezono M, Okada T Front Psychol. 2022; 13:864116.

PMID: 35558687 PMC: 9088812. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864116.


Effects of facial expression and gaze interaction on brain dynamics during a working memory task in preschool children.

Kashihara K, Matsuda Y PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266713.

PMID: 35482742 PMC: 9049575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266713.


References
1.
Putman P, Hermans E, van Honk J . Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze. Emotion. 2006; 6(1):94-102. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.94. View

2.
Rhodes G, Addison B, Jeffery L, Ewbank M, Calder A . Facial expressions of threat influence perceived gaze direction in 8 year-olds. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49317. PMC: 3498150. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049317. View

3.
Fox E, Mathews A, Calder A, Yiend J . Anxiety and sensitivity to gaze direction in emotionally expressive faces. Emotion. 2007; 7(3):478-86. PMC: 2757723. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.478. View

4.
Brosch T, Pourtois G, Sander D, Vuilleumier P . Additive effects of emotional, endogenous, and exogenous attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(7):1779-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.056. View

5.
Holmes A, Mogg K, de Fockert J, Nielsen M, Bradley B . Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013; 14(2):827-35. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4. View