» Articles » PMID: 19272155

T-cell Metagene Predicts a Favorable Prognosis in Estrogen Receptor-negative and HER2-positive Breast Cancers

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Mar 11
PMID 19272155
Citations 256
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Lymphocyte infiltration (LI) is often seen in breast cancer but its importance remains controversial. A positive correlation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and LI has been described, which was associated with a more favorable outcome. However, specific lymphocytes might also promote tumor progression by shifting the cytokine milieu in the tumor.

Methods: Affymetrix HG-U133A microarray data of 1,781 primary breast cancer samples from 12 datasets were included. The correlation of immune system-related metagenes with different immune cells, clinical parameters, and survival was analyzed.

Results: A large cluster of nearly 600 genes with functions in immune cells was consistently obtained in all datasets. Seven robust metagenes from this cluster can act as surrogate markers for the amount of different immune cell types in the breast cancer sample. An IgG metagene as a marker for B cells had no significant prognostic value. In contrast, a strong positive prognostic value for the T-cell surrogate marker (lymphocyte-specific kinase (LCK) metagene) was observed among all estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors and those ER-positive tumors with a HER2 overexpression. Moreover ER-negative tumors with high expression of both IgG and LCK metagenes seem to respond better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Precise definitions of the specific subtypes of immune cells in the tumor can be accomplished from microarray data. These surrogate markers define subgroups of tumors with different prognosis. Importantly, all known prognostic gene signatures uniformly assign poor prognosis to all ER-negative tumors. In contrast, the LCK metagene actually separates the ER-negative group into better or worse prognosis.

Citing Articles

Prognostic and molecular multi-platform analysis of CALGB 40603 (Alliance) and public triple-negative breast cancer datasets.

Felsheim B, Fernandez-Martinez A, Fan C, Pfefferle A, Hayward M, Hoadley K NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025; 11(1):24.

PMID: 40057511 PMC: 11890565. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-025-00740-z.


Exploring the role of TIGIT in patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer as a novel predictor of prognosis and immunotherapy response.

Liu L, Wu P, Wang B, Dong J, Zhang C, Liu W Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025; 74(4):134.

PMID: 40035834 PMC: 11880484. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-025-03985-6.


Mechanistic insights into PROS1 inhibition of bladder cancer progression and angiogenesis via the AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin pathway.

Fan X, Wang J, Chen S, Li X, Cao J, Wang H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4748.

PMID: 39922934 PMC: 11807197. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89217-4.


Comprehensive analysis reveals PLK3 as a promising immune target and prognostic indicator in glioma.

Zhu T, Zhao C, Gong R, Qian A, Wang X, Lu F Oncol Res. 2025; 33(2):431-442.

PMID: 39866232 PMC: 11753997. DOI: 10.32604/or.2024.050794.


RBM47 is a novel immunotherapeutic target and prognostic biomarker in gliomas.

Wei W, Cao Y, Lu X, Wang L, Li J, Deng G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):854.

PMID: 39757245 PMC: 11701128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84719-z.


References
1.
Alexe G, Dalgin G, Scanfeld D, Tamayo P, Mesirov J, DeLisi C . High expression of lymphocyte-associated genes in node-negative HER2+ breast cancers correlates with lower recurrence rates. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(22):10669-76. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0539. View

2.
Bilik R, Mor C, Hazaz B, Moroz C . Characterization of T-lymphocyte subpopulations infiltrating primary breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1989; 28(2):143-7. PMC: 11038005. DOI: 10.1007/BF00199115. View

3.
Gentleman R, Carey V, Bates D, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S . Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004; 5(10):R80. PMC: 545600. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. View

4.
Loi S, Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Lallemand F, Tutt A, Gillet C . Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(10):1239-46. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1522. View

5.
Coussens L, Werb Z . Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002; 420(6917):860-7. PMC: 2803035. DOI: 10.1038/nature01322. View