» Articles » PMID: 19263979

Can the Canadian Heart Health Initiative Inform the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada?

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Mar 7
PMID 19263979
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is to build capacity to increase the quantity, quality and use of population health intervention research. But what capacity is required, and how should capacity be created? There may be relevant lessons from the Canadian Heart Health Initiative (CHHI), a 20-year initiative (1986-2006) that was groundbreaking in its attempt to bring together researchers and public health leaders (from government and non-government organizations) to jointly plan, conduct and act on relevant evidence. The present study focused on what enabled and constrained the ability to fund, conduct and use science in the CHHI.

Methods: Guided by a provisional capacity-building framework, a two-step methodology was used: a CHHI document analysis followed by consultation with CHHI leaders to refine and confirm emerging findings.

Results: A few well-positioned, visionary people conceived of the CHHI as a long-term, coherent initiative that would have impact, and they then created an environment to enable this to become reality. To achieve the vision, capacity was needed to a) align science (research and evaluation) with public health policy and program priorities, including the capacity to study "natural experiments" and b) build meaningful partnerships within and across sectors.

Conclusion: There is now an opportunity to apply lessons from the CHHI in planning PHIRIC.

Citing Articles

Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review.

Korn A, Cruz J, Smith N, Jacob R, Carney M, Slater W J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e203.

PMID: 39655026 PMC: 11626584. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.614.


Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.

Pinto R, Park S, Miles R, Ong P Implement Res Pract. 2023; 2:2633489520985305.

PMID: 37089998 PMC: 9978697. DOI: 10.1177/2633489520985305.


An Analysis of the Structural Factors Affecting the Public Participation in Health Promotion.

Ghaumi R, Aminee T, Aminaee A, Dastoury M Glob J Health Sci. 2016; 8(8):53129.

PMID: 27045401 PMC: 5016344. DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p94.


Creating a collective impact on childhood obesity: Lessons from the SCOPE initiative.

Amed S, Naylor P, Pinkney S, Shea S, Masse L, Berg S Can J Public Health. 2015; 106(6):e426-33.

PMID: 26680435 PMC: 6972077. DOI: 10.17269/cjph.106.5114.


Networks to strengthen health systems for chronic disease prevention.

Willis C, Riley B, Herbert C, Best A Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(11):e39-48.

PMID: 24028225 PMC: 3828686. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301249.


References
1.
Dressendorfer R, Raine K, Dyck R, Plotnikoff R, Collins-Nakai R, McLaughlin W . A conceptual model of community capacity development for health promotion in the Alberta Heart Health Project. Health Promot Pract. 2004; 6(1):31-6. DOI: 10.1177/1524839903259302. View

2.
Goodman R, Speers M, McLeroy K, Fawcett S, Kegler M, Parker E . Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav. 1998; 25(3):258-78. DOI: 10.1177/109019819802500303. View

3.
Lomas J . Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000; 19(3):236-40. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236. View

4.
Riley B . Dissemination of heart health promotion in the Ontario Public Health System: 1989-1999. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(1):15-31. DOI: 10.1093/her/18.1.15. View

5.
Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C . Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?. Public Health. 2005; 119(9):751-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.11.008. View