Community Engagement in Dissemination and Implementation Models: A Narrative Review
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed in the extant literature. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs.
Methods: We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes. We built on Tabak et al.'s narrative review that identified 51 D&I models published up to 2012 and identified 23 D&I models published between 2012 and 2020 from the Health Research & Practice website (16 models) and PubMed database (7 models). Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs.
Results: We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. Few models with strong community content have been introduced since 2009.
Conclusion: This article bridges the community-engaged and D&I research literature by identifying community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models, targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Plain Language Summary: Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes, published between 2012 and 2020. Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. This article identified community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Kepper M, LHotta A, Shato T, Kwan B, Glasgow R, Luke D Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):82.
PMID: 39741305 PMC: 11686880. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01410-7.
Korn A, Cruz J, Smith N, Jacob R, Carney M, Slater W J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e203.
PMID: 39655026 PMC: 11626584. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.614.
Kang E, Ten Hoor G, Craig D, Rodriguez S, Stockton J, Fernandez M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e088359.
PMID: 39613426 PMC: 11605832. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088359.
Vorkoper S, Agot K, Dow D, Mbizvo M, Mugo C, Sam-Agudu N Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1439957.
PMID: 39469436 PMC: 11513342. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1439957.
Korn A, Oh A, Manian N, Tsakraklides S, Carter-Edwards L Transl Behav Med. 2024; 14(11):643-652.
PMID: 39304521 PMC: 11568842. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae048.