» Articles » PMID: 37089998

Community Engagement in Dissemination and Implementation Models: A Narrative Review

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37089998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed in the extant literature. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs.

Methods: We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes. We built on Tabak et al.'s narrative review that identified 51 D&I models published up to 2012 and identified 23 D&I models published between 2012 and 2020 from the Health Research & Practice website (16 models) and PubMed database (7 models). Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs.

Results: We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. Few models with strong community content have been introduced since 2009.

Conclusion: This article bridges the community-engaged and D&I research literature by identifying community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models, targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Plain Language Summary: Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes, published between 2012 and 2020. Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. This article identified community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Citing Articles

Supporting teams with designing for dissemination and sustainability: the design, development, and usability of a digital interactive platform.

Kepper M, LHotta A, Shato T, Kwan B, Glasgow R, Luke D Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):82.

PMID: 39741305 PMC: 11686880. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01410-7.


Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review.

Korn A, Cruz J, Smith N, Jacob R, Carney M, Slater W J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e203.

PMID: 39655026 PMC: 11626584. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.614.


Context, mechanisms and community engagement in implementation strategies: a systematic review protocol of implementation strategies designed using implementation mapping.

Kang E, Ten Hoor G, Craig D, Rodriguez S, Stockton J, Fernandez M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e088359.

PMID: 39613426 PMC: 11605832. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088359.


Building locally anchored implementation science capacity: the case of the adolescent HIV implementation science alliance-supported local iS alliances.

Vorkoper S, Agot K, Dow D, Mbizvo M, Mugo C, Sam-Agudu N Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1439957.

PMID: 39469436 PMC: 11513342. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1439957.


Practitioner perspectives on equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control.

Korn A, Oh A, Manian N, Tsakraklides S, Carter-Edwards L Transl Behav Med. 2024; 14(11):643-652.

PMID: 39304521 PMC: 11568842. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae048.


References
1.
Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Garlehner G, Lohr K, Griffith D . Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004; (99):1-8. PMC: 4780908. View

2.
Sampson R . The neighborhood context of well-being. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(3 Suppl):S53-64. View

3.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

4.
Aarons G, Hurlburt M, Horwitz S . Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38(1):4-23. PMC: 3025110. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7. View

5.
Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D . The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003; 327(7405):33-5. PMC: 164240. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33. View