» Articles » PMID: 19233292

T1 Weighted Brain Images at 7 Tesla Unbiased for Proton Density, T2* Contrast and RF Coil Receive B1 Sensitivity with Simultaneous Vessel Visualization

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Feb 24
PMID 19233292
Citations 149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

At high magnetic field, MR images exhibit large, undesirable signal intensity variations commonly referred to as "intensity field bias". Such inhomogeneities mostly originate from heterogeneous RF coil B(1) profiles and, with no appropriate correction, are further pronounced when utilizing rooted sum of square reconstruction with receive coil arrays. These artifacts can significantly alter whole brain high resolution T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) images that are extensively utilized for clinical diagnosis, for gray/white matter segmentation as well as for coregistration with functional time series. In T(1) weighted 3D-MPRAGE sequences, it is possible to preserve a bulk amount of T(1) contrast through space by using adiabatic inversion RF pulses that are insensitive to transmit B(1) variations above a minimum threshold. However, large intensity variations persist in the images, which are significantly more difficult to address at very high field where RF coil B(1) profiles become more heterogeneous. Another characteristic of T(1)w MPRAGE sequences is their intrinsic sensitivity to Proton Density and T(2)(*) contrast, which cannot be removed with post-processing algorithms utilized to correct for receive coil sensitivity. In this paper, we demonstrate a simple technique capable of producing normalized, high resolution T(1)w 3D-MPRAGE images that are devoid of receive coil sensitivity, Proton Density and T(2)(*) contrast. These images, which are suitable for routinely obtaining whole brain tissue segmentation at 7 T, provide higher T(1) contrast specificity than standard MPRAGE acquisitions. Our results show that removing the Proton Density component can help in identifying small brain structures and that T(2)(*) induced artifacts can be removed from the images. The resulting unbiased T(1)w images can also be used to generate Maximum Intensity Projection angiograms, without additional data acquisition, that are inherently registered with T(1)w structural images. In addition, we introduce a simple technique to reduce residual signal intensity variations induced by transmit B(1) heterogeneity. Because this approach requires two 3D images, one divided with the other, head motion could create serious problems, especially at high spatial resolution. To alleviate such inter-scan motion problems, we developed a new sequence where the two contrast acquisitions are interleaved within a single scan. This interleaved approach however comes with greater risk of intra-scan motion issues because of a longer single scan time. Users can choose between these two trade offs depending on specific protocols and patient populations. We believe that the simplicity and the robustness of this double contrast based approach to address intensity field bias at high field and improve T(1) contrast specificity, together with the capability of simultaneously obtaining angiography maps, advantageously counter balance the potential drawbacks of the technique, mainly a longer acquisition time and a moderate reduction in signal to noise ratio.

Citing Articles

The contribution of the vascular architecture and cerebrovascular reactivity to the BOLD signal formation across cortical depth.

Roefs E, Schellekens W, Baez-Yanez M, Bhogal A, Groen I, van Osch M Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024; 2:1-19.

PMID: 39411228 PMC: 11472217. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00203.


Brain structure comparison among Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and healthy controls using 7T MRI.

Moon H, Kim A, Park Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(19):e38139.

PMID: 38728497 PMC: 11081548. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038139.


Magnetoencephalography Atlas Viewer for Dipole Localization and Viewing.

Fonseca N, Bowerman J, Askari P, Proskovec A, Feltrin F, Veltkamp D J Imaging. 2024; 10(4).

PMID: 38667978 PMC: 11051542. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10040080.


Age-related differences in macromolecular resonances observed in ultra-short-TE STEAM MR spectra at 7T.

Genovese G, Terpstra M, Filip P, Mangia S, McCarten J, Hemmy L Magn Reson Med. 2024; 92(1):4-14.

PMID: 38441257 PMC: 11055657. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30061.


MP2RAGE vs. MPRAGE surface-based morphometry in focal epilepsy.

Kronlage C, Heide E, Hagberg G, Bender B, Scheffler K, Martin P PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0296843.

PMID: 38330027 PMC: 10852321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296843.


References
1.
Wang J, Qiu M, Constable R . In vivo method for correcting transmit/receive nonuniformities with phased array coils. Magn Reson Med. 2005; 53(3):666-74. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20377. View

2.
Bernstein M, Huston 3rd J, Ward H . Imaging artifacts at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24(4):735-46. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20698. View

3.
Bottomley P, Andrew E . RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: implications for NMR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1978; 23(4):630-43. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/23/4/006. View

4.
Keltner J, Carlson J, Roos M, Wong S, Wong T, Budinger T . Electromagnetic fields of surface coil in vivo NMR at high frequencies. Magn Reson Med. 1991; 22(2):467-80. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910220254. View

5.
Vaughan J, Garwood M, Collins C, Liu W, Delabarre L, Adriany G . 7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1156. View