» Articles » PMID: 38667978

Magnetoencephalography Atlas Viewer for Dipole Localization and Viewing

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38667978
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a noninvasive neuroimaging technique widely recognized for epilepsy and tumor mapping. MEG clinical reporting requires a multidisciplinary team, including expert input regarding each dipole's anatomic localization. Here, we introduce a novel tool, the "Magnetoencephalography Atlas Viewer" (MAV), which streamlines this anatomical analysis. The MAV normalizes the patient's Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, reverse-normalizes MNI atlases to the native MRI, identifies MEG dipole files, and matches dipoles' coordinates to their spatial location in atlas files. It offers a user-friendly and interactive graphical user interface (GUI) for displaying individual dipoles, groups, coordinates, anatomical labels, and a tri-planar MRI view of the patient with dipole overlays. It evaluated over 273 dipoles obtained in clinical epilepsy subjects. Consensus-based ground truth was established by three neuroradiologists, with a minimum agreement threshold of two. The concordance between the ground truth and MAV labeling ranged from 79% to 84%, depending on the normalization method. Higher concordance rates were observed in subjects with minimal or no structural abnormalities on the MRI, ranging from 80% to 90%. The MAV provides a straightforward MEG dipole anatomic localization method, allowing a nonspecialist to prepopulate a report, thereby facilitating and reducing the time of clinical reporting.

References
1.
Taylor K, Joshi A, Hirfanoglu T, Grinenko O, Liu P, Wang X . Validation of semi-automated anatomically labeled SEEG contacts in a brain atlas for mapping connectivity in focal epilepsy. Epilepsia Open. 2021; 6(3):493-503. PMC: 8408609. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12499. View

2.
Mugler 3rd J, Brookeman J . Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990; 15(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910150117. View

3.
Smith S, Jenkinson M, Woolrich M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:S208-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. View

4.
Woolrich M, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T . Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage. 2008; 45(1 Suppl):S173-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055. View

5.
Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani B, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang M . Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage. 2009; 46(3):786-802. PMC: 2747506. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037. View