» Articles » PMID: 19229657

The 6-item CTS Symptoms Scale: a Brief Outcomes Measure for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2009 Feb 21
PMID 19229657
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a psychometrically appropriate brief symptoms measure of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods: Preoperative CTS 11-item symptom severity and 8-item functional status scales from 693 patients (71% women) with CTS were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis yielding a revised CTS symptoms scale. A validation sample of 213 patients (68% women) with CTS completed the 11-item disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), and the revised symptoms scale and 116 patients also completed the original CTS symptom severity scale (median interval 11 days).

Results: Of the 11 CTS symptom severity scale items, 2 items that on factor analysis associated with the functional status items were removed. After IRT recalibrations of the remaining symptom severity scale items, 2 non-fitting items were removed and 2 items were merged creating the 6-item CTS symptoms scale. Factor analysis showed one dominant factor explaining 58% of the variance. Reliability was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.86; IRT person separation reliability = 0.88). No item displayed significant differential item functioning. The 6-item CTS symptoms scale showed strong correlation with the QuickDASH (r = 0.70) and agreement with the original symptom severity scale (ICC = 0.80).

Conclusion: The 6-item CTS symptoms scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in CTS.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Assessment of Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Conditions in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Iskander S, Halbesma G, Hoogbergen M, Young-Afat D, Veldhuizen I JPRAS Open. 2025; 43:475-490.

PMID: 39995575 PMC: 11849562. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.12.005.


Correlating symptom severity index, clinical diagnostic criteria of CTS-6 and timed Phalen's test in clinical evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Priya A, Bansal C, Mangla H, Shinde M, Ghosh T J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(11):5047-5051.

PMID: 39722997 PMC: 11668422. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_541_24.


Characteristics of Patients with Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome but Negative Diagnostic Testing.

Latario L, Fowler J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(5):e5816.

PMID: 38752222 PMC: 11095960. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005816.


Final 1-Year Results of the TUTOR Randomized Trial Comparing Carpal Tunnel Release with Ultrasound Guidance to Mini-open Technique.

Eberlin K, Amis B, Berkbigler T, Dy C, Fischer M, Gluck J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(3):e5665.

PMID: 38440365 PMC: 10911521. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005665.


Endoscopic carpal surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review.

Liawrungrueang W, Wongsiri S, Sarasombath P SAGE Open Med. 2023; 11:20503121231177111.

PMID: 37324119 PMC: 10262635. DOI: 10.1177/20503121231177111.


References
1.
Mallette P, Zhao M, Zurakowski D, Ring D . Muscle atrophy at diagnosis of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(6):855-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.009. View

2.
Rosales R, Benseny Delgado E, de la Lastra-Bosch I . Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am. 2002; 27(2):334-43. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059. View

3.
de Carvalho Leite J, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F . A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7:78. PMC: 1624826. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-78. View

4.
Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A . Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69(1):82-8. DOI: 10.3109/17453679809002363. View

5.
Edelen M, Reeve B . Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res. 2007; 16 Suppl 1:5-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0. View