A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2006 Oct 24

PMID 17054773

Citations 118

Authors

Jose C de Carvalho Leite

Christina Jerosch-Herold

Fujian Song

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. We conducted a systematic review of published studies on the psychometric properties of the BCTQ to determine the level of evidence on the instrument's validity, reliability and responsiveness to date.

Methods: A search of the databases Medline, CINAHL, AMED and PsychInfo was conducted to retrieve studies which investigated one or more of the psychometric properties of the BCTQ. Data abstraction was undertaken by the first two authors.

Results: Ten studies were retrieved which met the inclusion criteria. One study evaluated face and content validity (43 patients) eight studies assessed construct validity (932 patients), four studies tested reliability (126 patients) and nine studies assessed responsiveness (986 patients). Interpretability was evaluated in one study and acceptability in eight studies (978 patients).

Conclusion: The BCTQ is a standardised, patient-based outcome measure of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The evidence base of the psychometric properties indicates that the BCTQ is a valid, reliable, responsive and acceptable instrument and should be included as a primary outcome measures in future CTS trials.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the impact of continuous nursing and cluster nursing on carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery.

Chen Y, Li R, Zhu Y, Chen R J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):21.

PMID: 39773241 PMC: 11705744. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05246-1.

Open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: is it necessary to release the antebrachial fascia? A randomized clinical trial study.

Razavipour M, Taheri S, Abdollahi A, Yahaghi Y Front Surg. 2024; 11:1300972.

PMID: 39664791 PMC: 11631863. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1300972.

The Correlation Between Electrodiagnostic Severity and Patient-Reported Disability Among Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients.

Soykok G, Guler E Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024; 27(6):677-683.

PMID: 39585299 PMC: 11745245. DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_241_24.

Effects of Kinesio tape on individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled study.

Chen W, Chou W, Hsu M, You Y, Wang Y, Cheng Y Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1494707.

PMID: 39582988 PMC: 11582044. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1494707.

Influences of Variability in Attenuation Compensation on the Estimation of Backscatter Coefficient of Median Nerves in Vivo.

Wu Y, Barrere V, Han A, Chang E, Andre M, Shah S J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(1):97-109.

PMID: 39382438 PMC: 11632647. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16585.

References

Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E . A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113(4):1184-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110202.08818.c1. View

Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M, Jones D . Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2(14):i-iv, 1-74. View

Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E . A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(5):1137-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135850.37523.d0. View

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

Patrick D, Deyo R . Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989; 27(3 Suppl):S217-32. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018. View

Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A . A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(11):1585-92. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002. View

Katz J, Gelberman R, Wright E, Lew R, Liang M . Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care. 1994; 32(11):1127-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199411000-00005. View

Dias J, Bhowal B, Wildin C, Thompson J . Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand. Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(2):235-40. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.10838. View

Carr A, Higginson I . Are quality of life measures patient centred?. BMJ. 2001; 322(7298):1357-60. PMC: 1120435. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1357. View

10.

Szabo R . Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful?. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(6):993-1002. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487. View

11.

Rosales R, Benseny Delgado E, de la Lastra-Bosch I . Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am. 2002; 27(2):334-43. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059. View

12.

Mondelli M, Ginanneschi F, Rossi S, Reale F, Padua L, Giannini F . Inter-observer reproducibility and responsiveness of a clinical severity scale in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand. 2002; 106(5):263-8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01368.x. View

13.

Gay R, Amadio P, Johnson J . Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28(2):250-4. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50043. View

14.

de Campos C, Manzano G, de Andrade L, Castelo Filho A, Nobrega J . [Translation and validation of an instrument for evaluation of severity of symptoms and the functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003; 61(1):51-5. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2003000100009. View

15.

Greenslade J, Mehta R, Belward P, Warwick D . Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?. J Hand Surg Br. 2004; 29(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.010. View

16.

Katz J, Punnett L, Simmons B, Fossel A, Mooney N, KELLER R . Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: the validity of self-reported health measures. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86(1):52-6. PMC: 1380360. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.52. View

17.

Amadio P, Silverstein M, Ilstrup D, Schleck C, Jensen L . Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg Am. 1996; 21(3):338-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80340-6. View

18.

Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

19.

Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A . Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69(1):82-8. DOI: 10.3109/17453679809002363. View

20.

Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz K, KELLER R, Lew R, Fossel A . Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care. 1998; 36(4):491-502. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00005. View