» Articles » PMID: 19203165

The Pre-engagement Cohabitation Effect: a Replication and Extension of Previous Findings

Overview
Journal J Fam Psychol
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Feb 11
PMID 19203165
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using a random telephone survey of men and women married within the past 10 years (N = 1,050), the current study replicated previous findings regarding the timing of engagement and the premarital cohabitation effect (see Kline et al., 2004). Those who cohabited before engagement (43.1%) reported lower marital satisfaction, dedication, and confidence as well as more negative communication and greater potential for divorce than those who cohabited only after engagement (16.4%) or not at all until marriage (40.5%). These differences were generally small, but could not be accounted for by length of marriage or by variables often associated with selection into cohabitation (i.e., age, income, education, and religiousness). Similar results were found in a subsample of individuals who cohabited only with the current spouse. There were no significant differences between those who cohabited after engagement and not at all before marriage, supporting a pre-engagement, but not a premarital cohabitation effect.

Citing Articles

Cohabitation, Relationship Stability, Relationship Adjustment, and Children's Mental Health Over 10 Years.

Foran H, Mueller J, Schulz W, Hahlweg K Front Psychol. 2022; 12:746306.

PMID: 35185668 PMC: 8847607. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746306.


Helping Couples in the Shadow of COVID-19.

Stanley S, Markman H Fam Process. 2020; 59(3):937-955.

PMID: 32589263 PMC: 7361298. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12575.


Maintenance of Gains in Relationship and Individual Functioning Following the Online OurRelationship Program.

Doss B, Roddy M, Nowlan K, Rothman K, Christensen A Behav Ther. 2019; 50(1):73-86.

PMID: 30661568 PMC: 6347396. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.011.


The Online OurRelationship Program for Relationally Distressed Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nowlan K, Roddy M, Doss B Couple Family Psychol. 2018; 6(3):189-204.

PMID: 29379675 PMC: 5786273. DOI: 10.1037/cfp0000080.


PREP for Strong Bonds: A review of outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.

Allen E, Stanley S, Rhoades G, Markman H Contemp Fam Ther. 2015; 37(3):232-246.

PMID: 26366041 PMC: 4565720. DOI: 10.1007/s10591-014-9325-3.


References
1.
Kline G, Stanley S, Markman H, Olmos-Gallo P, St Peters M, Whitton S . Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. J Fam Psychol. 2004; 18(2):311-318. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.311. View

2.
Whitton S, Olmos-Gallo P, Stanley S, Prado L, Kline G, St Peters M . Depressive symptoms in early marriage: predictions from relationship confidence and negative marital interaction. J Fam Psychol. 2007; 21(2):297-306. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.297. View

3.
Stanley S, Markman H, Whitton S . Communication, conflict, and commitment: insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Fam Process. 2003; 41(4):659-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x. View

4.
Bumpass L, Lu H . Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States. Popul Stud (Camb). 2017; 54(1):29-41. DOI: 10.1080/713779060. View

5.
Stanley S, Amato P, Johnson C, Markman H . Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: findings from a large, random household survey. J Fam Psychol. 2006; 20(1):117-26. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.117. View