» Articles » PMID: 22524318

Predictors of Extradyadic Sexual Involvement in Unmarried Opposite-sex Relationships

Overview
Journal J Sex Res
Publisher Routledge
Date 2012 Apr 25
PMID 22524318
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using a sample of unmarried individuals in opposite-sex romantic relationships that was representative of the United States (N = 933), the current study prospectively evaluated predictors of extradyadic sexual involvement (ESI) over 20 months (from 2007-2010). Data were collected with self-report questionnaires via U.S. mail. Participants were 18 to 35 years old, and 34.9% were male. Variables tested as predictors included involved-partner factors such as demographic characteristics, sexual history, and mental health, as well as relationship-related factors including communication, sexual dynamics, and aspects of commitment. Future ESI was significantly predicted by lower baseline relationship satisfaction, negative communication, aggression, lower dedication, absence of plans to marry, suspicion of partners' ESI, and partners' ESI. It was not predicted by sexual frequency, sexual dissatisfaction, or cohabitation status. Although more problems with alcohol use, more previous sex partners, and having parents who never married one another predicted future ESI, there were many involved-partner demographic factors that did not predict later ESI (e.g., gender, age, education, religiosity, having divorced parents, and having children). None of the results were moderated by gender. These results suggest that compared to demographic characteristics, relationship dynamics and negative interactions are more strongly predictive of future ESI. Implications for future research are discussed.

Citing Articles

Revisiting the Charmed Circle: A Reflexive Examination of Unanswered Questions in the Infidelity Literature.

Weiser D, Shrout M Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2025; 18(7).

PMID: 40028436 PMC: 11870391. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12983.


Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences.

Rokach A, Chan S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36900915 PMC: 10002055. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053904.


Money lies and extramarital ties: Predicting separate and joint occurrences of financial deception and extramarital infidelity.

Dew J, Saxey M, Mettmann A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1038169.

PMID: 36483710 PMC: 9722948. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038169.


Relationship Satisfaction and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Networks: A Preliminary Online Study of Hispanic Women.

Gonzalez-Rivera J, Aquino-Serrano F, Perez-Torres E Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021; 10(1):297-309.

PMID: 34542486 PMC: 8314247. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe10010023.


Infidelity in the Time of COVID-19.

Gordon K, Mitchell E Fam Process. 2020; 59(3):956-966.

PMID: 32621371 PMC: 7361516. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12576.


References
1.
Cousins A, Gangestad S . Perceived threats of female infidelity, male proprietariness, and violence in college dating couples. Violence Vict. 2008; 22(6):651-68. DOI: 10.1891/088667007782793156. View

2.
Maddox A, Rhoades G, Markman H . Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: associations with relationship quality. Arch Sex Behav. 2009; 40(2):441-8. PMC: 2891580. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4. View

3.
Blow A, Hartnett K . Infidelity in committed relationships I: a methodological review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2005; 31(2):183-216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01555.x. View

4.
Allen E, Rhoades G, Stanley S, Markman H, Williams T, Melton J . Premarital precursors of marital infidelity. Fam Process. 2008; 47(2):243-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00251.x. View

5.
Choi K, Catania J, Dolcini M . Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among US adults: results from the National AIDS Behavioral Survey. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(12):2003-7. PMC: 1615405. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.2003. View