» Articles » PMID: 19200628

A Framework for the Definition of Standardized Protocols for Measuring Upper-extremity Kinematics

Overview
Date 2009 Feb 10
PMID 19200628
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasing interest in upper extremity biomechanics has led to closer investigations of both segment movements and detailed joint motion. Unfortunately, conceptual and practical differences in the motion analysis protocols used up to date reduce compatibility for post data and cross validation analysis and so weaken the body of knowledge. This difficulty highlights a need for standardised protocols, each addressing a set of questions of comparable content. The aim of this work is therefore to open a discussion and propose a flexible framework to support: (1) the definition of standardised protocols, (2) a standardised description of these protocols, and (3) the formulation of general recommendations.

Methods: Proposal of a framework for the definition of standardized protocols.

Findings: The framework is composed by two nested flowcharts. The first defines what a motion analysis protocol is by pointing out its role in a motion analysis study. The second flowchart describes the steps to build a protocol, which requires decisions on the joints or segments to be investigated and the description of their mechanical equivalent model, the definition of the anatomical or functional coordinate frames, the choice of marker or sensor configuration and the validity of their use, the definition of the activities to be measured and the refinements that can be applied to the final measurements. Finally, general recommendations are proposed for each of the steps based on the current literature, and open issues are highlighted for future investigation and standardisation.

Interpretation: Standardisation of motion analysis protocols is urgent. The proposed framework can guide this process through the rationalisation of the approach.

Citing Articles

A protocol for obtaining upper and lower extremity joints' range of motion in children using three-dimensional motion analysis system.

Afifi M, Abdulazeez M, Aminian K, Stylianides G, Abdullah K Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1416175.

PMID: 39234307 PMC: 11371791. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1416175.


Residual kinematic deviations of the shoulder during humeral elevation after conservative treatment for mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

Hung L, Lu H, Chen T, Wang T, Lu T Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1413679.

PMID: 39183820 PMC: 11341403. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1413679.


Influence of Lateralization and Distalization on Joint Function after Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Longo U, Franceschetti E, Carnevale A, Schena E, Cozza G, Perricone G Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38136000 PMC: 10740542. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121409.


Performance Evaluation of an Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Rehabilitation after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Carnevale A, Mannocchi I, Schena E, Carli M, Sassi M, Marino M Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002429 PMC: 10668954. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10111305.


Effect of COVID-19 on Musculoskeletal Performance in Gait and the Timed-Up and Go Test.

Kowal M, Morgiel E, Winiarski S, Gieysztor E, Madej M, Sebastian A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445219 PMC: 10342244. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134184.