Differences in Tridimensional Shoulder Kinematics Between Asymptomatic Subjects and Subjects Suffering from Rotator Cuff Tears by Means of Inertial Sensors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2023 Jan 21

PMID 36679809

Authors

Cristina Roldan-Jimenez

Miguel Cuadros-Romero

Paul Bennett

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in three-dimensional shoulder kinematics between asymptomatic subjects and patients who were diagnosed with rotator cuff tears. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 13 symptomatic subjects and 14 asymptomatic subjects. Data were obtained from three inertial sensors placed on the humerus, scapula and sternum. Kinematic data from the glenohumeral, scapulothoracic and thoracohumeral joints were also calculated. The participants performed shoulder abductions and flexions. The principal angles of movements and resultant vectors in each axis were studied. Results: The glenohumeral joint showed differences in abduction (p = 0.001) and flexion (p = 0.000), while differences in the scapulothoracic joint were only significant during flexion (p = 0.001). The asymptomatic group showed higher velocity values in all sensors for both movements, with the differences being significant (p < 0.007). Acceleration differences were found in the scapula during abduction (p = 0.001) and flexion (p = 0.014), as well as in the sternum only during shoulder abduction (p = 0.022). Conclusion: The results showed kinematic differences between the patients and asymptomatic subjects in terms of the mobility, velocity and acceleration variables, with lower values for the patients.

Citing Articles

Impact of Physiotherapy on Shoulder Kinematics in Swimmers with Swimmer's Shoulder Pain.

Raffini A, Martini M, Mazzari L, Buoite Stella A, Deodato M, Murena L Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771674 PMC: 11679707. DOI: 10.3390/s24247936.

References

Zhao X, Miao C, Zhang H . Multi-Feature Nonlinear Optimization Motion Estimation Based on RGB-D and Inertial Fusion. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(17). PMC: 7506712. DOI: 10.3390/s20174666. View

Veeger H, van der Helm F, Chadwick E, Magermans D . Toward standardized procedures for recording and describing 3-D shoulder movements. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003; 35(3):440-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195521. View

Pichonnaz C, Lecureux E, Bassin J, Duc C, Farron A, Aminian K . Enhancing clinically-relevant shoulder function assessment using only essential movements. Physiol Meas. 2015; 36(3):547-60. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/3/547. View

Gosala N, Wang F, Cui Z, Liang H, Glauser O, Wu S . Self-Calibrated Multi-Sensor Wearable for Hand Tracking and Modeling. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021; 29(3):1769-1784. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3131230. View

Lewis J . Rotator cuff related shoulder pain: Assessment, management and uncertainties. Man Ther. 2016; 23:57-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.03.009. View

Korver R, Heyligers I, Samijo S, Grimm B . Inertia based functional scoring of the shoulder in clinical practice. Physiol Meas. 2014; 35(2):167-76. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/2/167. View

Keshavarz R, Tajali S, Mir S, Ashrafi H . The role of scapular kinematics in patients with different shoulder musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review approach. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017; 21(2):386-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.09.002. View

De Baets L, van der Straaten R, Matheve T, Timmermans A . Shoulder assessment according to the international classification of functioning by means of inertial sensor technologies: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2017; 57:278-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.025. View

Roren A, Lefevre-Colau M, Poiraudeau S, Fayad F, Pasqui V, Roby-Brami A . A new description of scapulothoracic motion during arm movements in healthy subjects. Man Ther. 2014; 20(1):46-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2014.06.006. View

10.

MacDonald P, Clark P, Sutherland K . An analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the Hawkins and Neer subacromial impingement signs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9(4):299-301. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2000.106918. View

11.

Gabel C, Michener L, Burkett B, Neller A . The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(3):328-48. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.001. View

12.

Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly B, Ring D . A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(12):1913-1921. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001. View

13.

Hegedus E, Goode A, Campbell S, Morin A, Tamaddoni M, Moorman 3rd C . Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 42(2):80-92. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038406. View

14.

Neer 2nd C . Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (173):70-7. View

15.

Wu G, van der Helm F, Veeger H, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005; 38(5):981-992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042. View

16.

Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

17.

Duc C, Farron A, Pichonnaz C, Jolles B, Bassin J, Aminian K . Distribution of arm velocity and frequency of arm usage during daily activity: objective outcome evaluation after shoulder surgery. Gait Posture. 2012; 38(2):247-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.021. View

18.

Matthewson G, Beach C, Nelson A, Woodmass J, Ono Y, Boorman R . Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Current Concepts. Adv Orthop. 2015; 2015:458786. PMC: 4480800. DOI: 10.1155/2015/458786. View

19.

Jolles B, Duc C, Coley B, Aminian K, Pichonnaz C, Bassin J . Objective evaluation of shoulder function using body-fixed sensors: a new way to detect early treatment failures?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(7):1074-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.026. View

20.

Boettcher C, Ginn K, Cathers I . The 'empty can' and 'full can' tests do not selectively activate supraspinatus. J Sci Med Sport. 2008; 12(4):435-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.09.005. View