» Articles » PMID: 19165579

The Science of USP 1 and 2 Dissolution: Present Challenges and Future Relevance

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 2009 Jan 24
PMID 19165579
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since its inception, the dissolution test has come under increasing levels of scrutiny regarding its relevance, especially to the correlation of results to levels of drug in blood. The technique is discussed, limited to solid oral dosage forms, beginning with the scientific origins of the dissolution test, followed by a discussion of the roles of dissolution in product development, consistent batch manufacture (QC release), and stability testing. The ultimate role of dissolution testing, "to have the results correlated to in vivo results or in vivo in vitro correlation," is reviewed. The recent debate on mechanical calibration versus performance testing using USP calibrator tablets is presented, followed by a discussion of variability and hydrodynamics of USP Apparatus 1 and Apparatus 2. Finally, the future of dissolution testing is discussed in terms of new initiatives in the industry such as quality by design (QbD), process analytical technology (PAT), and design of experiments (DOE).

Citing Articles

Advancements in Colon-Targeted Drug Delivery: A Comprehensive Review on Recent Techniques with Emphasis on Hot-Melt Extrusion and 3D Printing Technologies.

Alshammari N, Elkanayati R, Vemula S, Al Shawakri E, Uttreja P, Almutairi M AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 25(7):236.

PMID: 39379609 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02965-w.


A Refined Thin-Film Model for Drug Dissolution Considering Radial Diffusion - Simulating Powder Dissolution.

Salish K, So C, Jeong S, Hou H, Mao C Pharm Res. 2024; 41(5):947-958.

PMID: 38589647 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03696-0.


Effects of Apex Size on Dissolution Profiles in the USP II Paddle Apparatus.

Yoshida H, Morita T, Abe Y, Inagaki A, Tomita N, Izutsu K AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023; 25(1):9.

PMID: 38158516 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-023-02722-5.


Releasing fast and slow: Non-destructive prediction of density and drug release from SLS 3D printed tablets using NIR spectroscopy.

Trenfield S, Xu X, Goyanes A, Rowland M, Wilsdon D, Gaisford S Int J Pharm X. 2023; 5:100148.

PMID: 36590827 PMC: 9798196. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2022.100148.


A microfluidic-based approach to investigate the inflammatory response of macrophages to pristine and drug-loaded nanostructured hydroxyapatite.

Carter S, Atif A, Diez-Escudero A, Grape M, Ginebra M, Tenje M Mater Today Bio. 2022; 16:100351.

PMID: 35865408 PMC: 9294551. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100351.


References
1.
Shah V, Tsong Y, Sathe P, Liu J . In vitro dissolution profile comparison--statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2. Pharm Res. 1998; 15(6):889-96. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011976615750. View

2.
Polli J, Rekhi G, Augsburger L, Shah V . Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1997; 86(6):690-700. DOI: 10.1021/js960473x. View

3.
Dokoumetzidis A, Macheras P . A century of dissolution research: from Noyes and Whitney to the biopharmaceutics classification system. Int J Pharm. 2006; 321(1-2):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.011. View

4.
Jantratid E, Prakongpan S, Amidon G, Dressman J . Feasibility of biowaiver extension to biopharmaceutics classification system class III drug products: cimetidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006; 45(4):385-99. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200645040-00004. View

5.
Khan K, Rooke D . Effect of disintegrant type upon the relationship between compressional pressure and dissolution efficiency. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976; 28(8):633-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb02816.x. View