» Articles » PMID: 19165352

Unobtrusive In-Home Monitoring of Cognitive and Physical Health: Reactions and Perceptions of Older Adults

Overview
Journal J Appl Gerontol
Date 2009 Jan 24
PMID 19165352
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While the potential benefits of unobtrusive in-home sensing technologies for maintaining health and independence of older adults have been highlighted in recent research, little is known about their views toward such technology. The aims of this project were to identify monitoring needs and expectations of community-residing elderly and their family members. Focus groups were presented with examples of in-home monitoring devices and data output; participants were asked to consider whether the data showed information that was meaningful to them, and how and to whom they would like to have such data disseminated. Content analysis of transcripts revealed four dominant themes: maintaining independence, detecting cognitive decline, sharing of information, and the tradeoff between privacy and usefulness of monitoring. The acceptance by elderly of unobtrusive in-home monitoring was closely tied to perceived utility of data generated by such systems. Privacy concerns appeared to be less of an issue than anticipated in this sample.

Citing Articles

Understanding how, for whom and under what circumstances telecare can support independence in community-dwelling older adults: a realist review.

Fothergill L, Hayes N, Latham Y, Hamilton J, Ahmed S, Holland C BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):59.

PMID: 39871177 PMC: 11771067. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05650-6.


An IoT-based cognitive impairment detection device: A newly proposed method in older adults care-choice reaction time-device development and data-driven validation.

Vizitiu C, Stara V, Antognoli L, Dinculescu A, Mosoi A, Kristaly D Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241293597.

PMID: 39502483 PMC: 11536570. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241293597.


Eyes on privacy: acceptance of video-based AAL impacted by activities being filmed.

Maidhof C, Offermann J, Ziefle M Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1186944.

PMID: 37469701 PMC: 10352951. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186944.


Acceptance and Privacy Perceptions Toward Video-based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: Scoping Review.

Mujirishvili T, Maidhof C, Florez-Revuelta F, Ziefle M, Richart-Martinez M, Cabrero-Garcia J J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45297.

PMID: 37126390 PMC: 10186188. DOI: 10.2196/45297.


Benefits and Barriers of Technology for Home Function and Mobility Assessment: Perspectives of Older Patients With Blood Cancers, Caregivers, and Clinicians.

Clancy D, Revette A, Bahl N, Ho K, Manor B, Testa M JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023; 7:e2200171.

PMID: 37098230 PMC: 10281405. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.22.00171.


References
1.
Sixsmith A . An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring system. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6(2):63-72. DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935059. View

2.
Demiris G, Rantz M, Aud M, Marek K, Tyrer H, Skubic M . Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of "smart home" technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004; 29(2):87-94. DOI: 10.1080/14639230410001684387. View

3.
Brownsell S, Bradley D, Bragg R, Catlin P, Carlier J . Do community alarm users want telecare?. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6(4):199-204. DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935356. View

4.
Hanson E, Magnusson L . Views of family carers and older people of information technology. Br J Nurs. 2002; 11(12):827-31. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.12.10306. View

5.
Mahoney D, Purtilo R, Webbe F, Alwan M, Bharucha A, Adlam T . In-home monitoring of persons with dementia: ethical guidelines for technology research and development. Alzheimers Dement. 2009; 3(3):217-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.388. View