» Articles » PMID: 39502483

An IoT-based Cognitive Impairment Detection Device: A Newly Proposed Method in Older Adults Care-choice Reaction Time-device Development and Data-driven Validation

Abstract

Background: Research shows that older adults' performance on choice reaction time (CRT) tests can predict cognitive decline. A simple CRT tool could help detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and preclinical dementia, allowing for further stratification of cognitive disorders on-site or via telemedicine.

Objective: The primary objective was to develop a CRT testing device and protocol to differentiate between two cognitive impairment categories: (a) subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment (na-MCI), and (b) amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) and multiple-domain a-MCI (a-MCI-MD).

Methods: A pilot study in Italy and Romania with 35 older adults (ages 61-85) assessed cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a CRT color response task. Reaction time, accuracy, and demographics were recorded, and machine learning classifiers analyzed performance differences to predict preclinical dementia and screen for mild cognitive deficits.

Results: Moderate correlations were found between the MMSE score and both mean reaction time and mean accuracy rate. There was a significant difference between the two groups' reaction time for blue light, but not for any other colors or for mean accuracy rate. SVM and RUSBoosted trees were found to have the best preclinical dementia prediction capabilities among the tested classifier algorithms, both presenting an accuracy rate of 77.1%.

Conclusions: CRT testing with machine learning effectively differentiates cognitive capacities in older adults, facilitating early diagnosis and stratification of neurocognitive diseases and can also identify impairments from stressors like dehydration and sleep deprivation. This study highlights the potential of portable CRT devices for monitoring cognitive function, including SCD and MCI.

References
1.
Jakobsen L, Sorensen J, Rask I, Jensen B, Kondrup J . Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients. Nutrition. 2010; 27(5):561-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.08.003. View

2.
Ahmad S . Choice reaction time and adequacy of dialysis: a new application of an old method. Hemodial Int. 2009; 7(2):118-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.00020.x. View

3.
Woods D, Wyma J, Yund E, Herron T, Reed B . Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:193. PMC: 4407573. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00193. View

4.
Shimizu M, Misumi M, Yamada M, Ohishi W, Yamamoto H, Kihara Y . Choice reaction time and grip strength as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged and elderly Japanese: from the Radiation Effects Research Foundation Adult Health study. Intern Med J. 2018; 48(11):1331-1336. DOI: 10.1111/imj.14002. View

5.
Thordardottir B, Malmgren Fange A, Lethin C, Rodriguez Gatta D, Chiatti C . Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:9196729. PMC: 6431399. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9196729. View