Yates J
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2024; 15:125-161.
PMID: 39228432
PMC: 11370775.
DOI: 10.2147/SAR.S431273.
Valles G, Huebschman J, Chow E, Kelly C, Guo Y, Smith L
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:880845.
PMID: 35783231
PMC: 9242005.
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.880845.
Youn D, Kim J, Hong Y, Park S, Lee J, Kim Y
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021; 238(8):2155-2165.
PMID: 33811503
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05840-9.
Roberts A, Casal L, Huitron-Resendiz S, Thompson T, Tarantino L
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018; 235(4):1179-1189.
PMID: 29423710
PMC: 5874174.
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-4834-7.
Banks M
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016; 1394(1):92-105.
PMID: 27936284
PMC: 5423852.
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13276.
Minimally Invasive Monitoring of Chronic Central Venous Catheter Patency in Mice Using Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).
Figueiredo G, Fiebig T, Kirschner S, Nikoubashman O, Kabelitz L, Othman A
PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0130661.
PMID: 26098622
PMC: 4476576.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130661.
Compared with DBA/2J mice, C57BL/6J mice demonstrate greater preference for saccharin and less avoidance of a cocaine-paired saccharin cue.
Freet C, Arndt A, Grigson P
Behav Neurosci. 2013; 127(3):474-84.
PMID: 23544599
PMC: 3967761.
DOI: 10.1037/a0032402.
Effects of adolescent nicotine exposure and withdrawal on intravenous cocaine self-administration during adulthood in male C57BL/6J mice.
Dickson P, Miller M, Rogers T, Blaha C, Mittleman G
Addict Biol. 2012; 19(1):37-48.
PMID: 22978678
PMC: 4084694.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00496.x.
Mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) and intracranial self-stimulation in C57BL/6J mice: comparison to cocaine.
Robinson J, Agoglia A, Fish E, Krouse M, Malanga C
Behav Brain Res. 2012; 234(1):76-81.
PMID: 22728726
PMC: 3408862.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.06.012.
Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats and 15 mouse strains.
Thomsen M, Caine S
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011; 19(5):321-41.
PMID: 21843010
PMC: 3292619.
DOI: 10.1037/a0024798.
Age-dependent and strain-dependent influences of morphine on mouse social investigation behavior.
Kennedy B, Panksepp J, Wong J, Krause E, Lahvis G
Behav Pharmacol. 2011; 22(2):147-59.
PMID: 21358324
PMC: 4393249.
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328343d7dd.
Evaluation of study design variables and their impact on food-maintained operant responding in mice.
Haluk D, Wickman K
Behav Brain Res. 2009; 207(2):394-401.
PMID: 19879302
PMC: 2814880.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.025.
Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: an affective neuroethological perspective.
Alcaro A, Huber R, Panksepp J
Brain Res Rev. 2007; 56(2):283-321.
PMID: 17905440
PMC: 2238694.
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.014.
C57BL/6J mice exhibit reduced dopamine D3 receptor-mediated locomotor-inhibitory function relative to DBA/2J mice.
McNamara R, Levant B, Taylor B, Ahlbrand R, Liu Y, Sullivan J
Neuroscience. 2006; 143(1):141-53.
PMID: 16938406
PMC: 1815378.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.015.
Impact of strain and D-amphetamine on impulsivity (delay discounting) in inbred mice.
Helms C, Reeves J, Mitchell S
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 188(2):144-51.
PMID: 16915383
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0478-0.
Enhanced acquisition of cocaine self-administration by increasing percentages of C57BL/6J genes in mice with a nonpreferring outbred background.
Ruiz-Durantez E, Hall S, Steffen C, Self D
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 186(4):553-60.
PMID: 16586086
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0379-2.
Cocaine self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement: comparison of C57BL/6J, 129X1/SvJ, and 129S6/SvEvTac inbred mice.
Thomsen M, Caine S
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 184(2):145-54.
PMID: 16369835
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-0207-0.
Susceptibility to conditioned place preference induced by addictive drugs in mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred strains.
Orsini C, Bonito-Oliva A, Conversi D, Cabib S
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 181(2):327-36.
PMID: 15864555
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-005-2259-6.
Self-administration of methohexital, midazolam and ethanol: effects on the pituitary-adrenal axis in rhesus monkeys.
Broadbear J, Winger G, Woods J
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004; 178(1):83-91.
PMID: 15322724
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1986-4.
Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse.
Orsini C, Buchini F, Piazza P, Puglisi-Allegra S, Cabib S
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 172(3):264-70.
PMID: 14600800
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1647-z.