» Articles » PMID: 19121547

Prostate Delineation Using CT and MRI for Radiotherapy Patients with Bilateral Hip Prostheses

Overview
Journal Radiother Oncol
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2009 Jan 6
PMID 19121547
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Prostate cancer patients with bilateral hip prostheses (b-HP) are rare, but pose unique challenges for high-dose radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of b-HP on prostate delineation using CT and MR.

Methods And Materials: The planning CT and MR of 7 patients with b-HP were co-registered. Four observers delineated the prostate on both data sets, blinded to the volumes delineated by their peers and those on the alternate image set. Inter-modality differences and inter-observer variability were quantified by calculating 3D volume overlaps. The effect of prostheses physical extent on these variables was evaluated. MR geometric distortion was explored using the differences in vector distances between three intra-prostatic markers (IPMs) on CT and MR.

Results: Prostate volumes on CT were consistently larger than MR volumes in all patients when averaged over the 4 observers (+10% to +46%, p<0.001). The mean inter-modality volume overlap was 1.59, which varied significantly between patients (1.35 to 1.82, p=0.04). There was a trend toward smaller inter-observer variability in the MR volumes (1.95 vs. 1.71, p=0.08). No differences could be identified between the IPM vectors on CT and MR.

Conclusions: Although limited by a small sample size, this study found that MR prostate volumes were significantly smaller than those from CT for b-HP patients. The largest differences between CT and MR prostate volumes and the greatest inter-observer variability on CT tended to be seen in patients with the largest prostheses. b-HP do not appear to cause measurable MR geometric distortions in the sequences used.

Citing Articles

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Men With Hip Prostheses: A Cautionary Note.

Shah S, Saravanakumar S, Conroy D, Sowmiyanarayanan S, Singh R, Pepin A Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e61432.

PMID: 38947568 PMC: 11214744. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61432.


Investigating the Impact of Knee Prosthesis in Patients' Body on Radiation Dose Distribution: A Monte Carlo Approach.

M R B, F S, S H, S B J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019; 9(3):345-354.

PMID: 31341880 PMC: 6613162. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1047.


Dosimetry Effects Caused by Unilateral and Bilateral Hip Prostheses: A Monte Carlo Case Study in Megavoltage Photon Radiotherapy for Computed Tomography Data without Metal Artifacts.

Mahuvava C, Du Plessis F J Med Phys. 2019; 43(4):236-246.

PMID: 30636849 PMC: 6299754. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_70_18.


Moderately hypofractionated prostate external-beam radiotherapy: an emerging standard.

Martin J, Supiot S, Keall P, Catton C Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1086):20170807.

PMID: 29322821 PMC: 6223284. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170807.


ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II.

Zaorsky N, Showalter T, Ezzell G, Nguyen P, Assimos D, DAmico A Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017; 2(3):437-454.

PMID: 29114613 PMC: 5605284. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.03.003.