» Articles » PMID: 23617289

The Potential for an Enhanced Role for MRI in Radiation-therapy Treatment Planning

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 27
PMID 23617289
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The exquisite soft-tissue contrast of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has meant that the technique is having an increasing role in contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs at risk (OAR) in radiation therapy treatment planning systems (TPS). MRI-planning scans from diagnostic MRI scanners are currently incorporated into the planning process by being registered to CT data. The soft-tissue data from the MRI provides target outline guidance and the CT provides a solid geometric and electron density map for accurate dose calculation on the TPS computer. There is increasing interest in MRI machine placement in radiotherapy clinics as an adjunct to CT simulators. Most vendors now offer 70 cm bores with flat couch inserts and specialised RF coil designs. We would refer to these devices as MR-simulators. There is also research into the future application of MR-simulators independent of CT and as in-room image-guidance devices. It is within the background of this increased interest in the utility of MRI in radiotherapy treatment planning that this paper is couched. The paper outlines publications that deal with standard MRI sequences used in current clinical practice. It then discusses the potential for using processed functional diffusion maps (fDM) derived from diffusion weighted image sequences in tracking tumor activity and tumor recurrence. Next, this paper reviews publications that describe the use of MRI in patient-management applications that may, in turn, be relevant to radiotherapy treatment planning. The review briefly discusses the concepts behind functional techniques such as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI sequences and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). Significant applications of MR are discussed in terms of the following treatment sites: brain, head and neck, breast, lung, prostate and cervix. While not yet routine, the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map analysis indicates an exciting future application for functional MRI. Although DW-MRI has not yet been routinely used in boost adaptive techniques, it is being assessed in cohort studies for sub-volume boosting in prostate tumors.

Citing Articles

Utilization of nanomaterials in MRI contrast agents and their role in therapy guided by imaging.

Wang W, Shang S, Wang Y, Xu B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1484577.

PMID: 39628648 PMC: 11611570. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1484577.


Clinical implementation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography solution for radiotherapy treatment of glioblastoma.

Emin S, Rossi E, Myrvold Rooth E, Dorniok T, Hedman M, Gagliardi G Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 30:100589.

PMID: 38818305 PMC: 11137592. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100589.


Evaluating the Hounsfield unit assignment and dose differences between CT-based standard and deep learning-based synthetic CT images for MRI-only radiation therapy of the head and neck.

Singhrao K, Dugan C, Calvin C, Pelayo L, Yom S, Chan J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 25(1):e14239.

PMID: 38128040 PMC: 10795453. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14239.


Patient-specific quality assurance strategies for synthetic computed tomography in magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy of the abdomen.

Dal Bello R, Lapaeva M, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Wallimann P, Gunther M, Konukoglu E Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100464.

PMID: 37497188 PMC: 10366576. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100464.


An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator.

Sohn J, Lim S, Das I, Yadav P Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100462.

PMID: 37449023 PMC: 10338140. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462.


References
1.
McVeigh P, Syed A, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider M . Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(5):1058-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0843-3. View

2.
Rockall A, Sohaib S, Harisinghani M, Babar S, Singh N, Jeyarajah A . Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(12):2813-21. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.166. View

3.
Mitchell D, Snyder B, Coakley F, Reinhold C, Thomas G, Amendola M . Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(36):5687-94. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4799. View

4.
Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, Hanicke W, Merboldt K . FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. 1986. J Magn Reson. 2011; 213(2):533-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.021. View

5.
Adams R, Aguilar J, Atkinson K, Cowley M, Elliott P, Duckett S . Reversible interactions with para-hydrogen enhance NMR sensitivity by polarization transfer. Science. 2009; 323(5922):1708-11. DOI: 10.1126/science.1168877. View