Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Evaluation of Stress-only Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/computed Tomography Hybrid Imaging: Comparison of Prospective Electrocardiogram-triggering Vs. Retrospective...
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: To determine diagnostic accuracy, effective radiation dose, and potential value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for hybrid imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) comparing prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering vs. retrospective ECG-gating.
Methods And Results: Two hundred patients underwent standard myocardial stress/rest- SPECT perfusion imaging, which served as standard of reference. One hundred consecutive patients underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-gating, and were compared with 100 patients who had previously undergone CTCA using retrospective ECG-gating. For predicting ischaemia, CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering and a stenosis cut-off >50% had a per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive value of 100, 84, 100, and 30%; respective values for CTCA with retrospective ECG-gating were similar (P = n.s.): 86, 83, 98, and 33%. Combining CTCA with stress-only SPECT revealed 100% clinical agreement with regard to perfusion defects, and provided additional information in half the patients on preclinical coronary findings. Effective radiation dose was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mSv for CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering, and 19.7 +/- 4.2 mSv with retrospective ECG-gating (P < 0.001) (5.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 24.1 +/- 4.3 mSv for hybrid imaging).
Conclusion: Prospective ECG-triggering for CTCA reduces radiation dose by almost 90% without affecting diagnostic performance. Combined imaging with stress-only SPECT is an attractive alternative to standard stress/rest-SPECT for evaluation of coronary artery disease, offering additional information on preclinical atherosclerosis.
Richards C, Obaid D Curr Cardiol Rev. 2019; 15(4):304-315.
PMID: 30806322 PMC: 8142354. DOI: 10.2174/1573403X15666190222163737.
Taban Sadeghi M, Mahmoudian B, Ghaffari S, Moharamzadeh P, Ala A, Pourafkari L Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(5):965-971.
PMID: 30661139 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-01518-0.
Novel SPECT Technologies and Approaches in Cardiac Imaging.
Slomka P, Hung G, Germano G, Berman D Cardiovasc Innov Appl. 2017; 2(1):31-46.
PMID: 29034066 PMC: 5640436. DOI: 10.15212/CVIA.2016.0052.
Taqueti V, Dorbala S, Wolinsky D, Abbott B, Heller G, Bateman T J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 24(4):1402-1426.
PMID: 28585034 PMC: 5942593. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0926-8.
Clerc O, Kaufmann B, Possner M, Liga R, Vontobel J, Mikulicic F Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(11):4650-4660.
PMID: 28500370 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4849-1.