» Articles » PMID: 19093916

Area-level Poverty is Associated with Greater Risk of Ambulatory-care-sensitive Hospitalizations in Older Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2008 Dec 20
PMID 19093916
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the frequency of ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations (ACSHs) and to compare the risk of ACSH in breast cancer survivors living in high-poverty with that of those in low-poverty areas.

Design: Prospective, multilevel study.

Setting: National, population-based 1991 to 1999 National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data linked with Medicare claims data throughout the United States.

Participants: Breast cancer survivors aged 66 and older.

Measurements: ACSH was classified according to diagnosis at hospitalization. The percentage of the population living below the U.S. federal poverty line was calculated at the census-tract level. Potential confounders included demographic characteristics, comorbidity, tumor and treatment factors, and availability of medical care.

Results: Of 47,643 women, 13.3% had at least one ACSH. Women who lived in high-poverty census tracts (>or=30% poverty rate) were 1.5 times (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34-1.72) as likely to have at least one ACSH after diagnosis as women who lived in low-poverty census tracts (<10% poverty rate). After adjusting for most confounders, results remained unchanged. After adjustment for comorbidity, the hazard ratio (HR) was reduced to 1.34 (95% CI=1.18-1.52), but adjusting for all variables did not further reduce the risk of ACSH associated with poverty rate beyond adjustment for comorbidity (HR=1.37, 95% CI=1.19-1.58).

Conclusion: Elderly breast cancer survivors who lived in high-poverty census tracts may be at increased risk of reduced posttreatment follow-up care, preventive care, or symptom management as a result of not having adequate, timely, and high-quality ambulatory primary care as suggested by ACSH.

Citing Articles

Neighborhood Characteristics and Cancer Survivorship: An Overview of the Current Literature on Neighborhood Landscapes and Cancer Care.

Namin S, Zhou Y, Neuner J, Beyer K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(13).

PMID: 34281129 PMC: 8297243. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137192.


Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Quan D, Luna Wong L, Shallal A, Madan R, Hamdan A, Ahdi H J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36(5):1302-1309.

PMID: 33506402 PMC: 7840076. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06527-1.


Liver Cancer Incidence and Area-Level Geographic Disparities in Pennsylvania-A Geo-Additive Approach.

Ortiz A, Wiese D, Sorice K, Nguyen M, Gonzalez E, Henry K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(20).

PMID: 33081168 PMC: 7588924. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207526.


Health-care utilization by prognosis profile in a managed care setting: using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Cancer Survival Calculator SEER*CSC.

Rabin B, Ellis J, Steiner J, Nekhlyudov L, Feuer E, Hankey B J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014; 2014(49):275-81.

PMID: 25417241 PMC: 4841171. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu023.


Niccolai et al. respond.

Niccolai L, Julian P, Meek J, Hadler J, Sosa L Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(10):e4-5.

PMID: 23947315 PMC: 3780755. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301498.


References
1.
Brown A, Ang A, Pebley A . The relationship between neighborhood characteristics and self-rated health for adults with chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(5):926-32. PMC: 1854885. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069443. View

2.
Pappas G, Hadden W, Kozak L, FISHER G . Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(5):811-6. PMC: 1381055. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.5.811. View

3.
Bouchardy C, Rapiti E, Blagojevic S, Vlastos A, Vlastos G . Older female cancer patients: importance, causes, and consequences of undertreatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(14):1858-69. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4208. View

4.
Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M . Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(6):613-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. View

5.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View