» Articles » PMID: 19088305

A High-density SNP-based Linkage Map of the Chicken Genome Reveals Sequence Features Correlated with Recombination Rate

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Dec 18
PMID 19088305
Citations 157
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The resolution of the chicken consensus linkage map has been dramatically improved in this study by genotyping 12,945 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on three existing mapping populations in chicken: the Wageningen (WU), East Lansing (EL), and Uppsala (UPP) mapping populations. As many as 8599 SNPs could be included, bringing the total number of markers in the current consensus linkage map to 9268. The total length of the sex average map is 3228 cM, considerably smaller than previous estimates using the WU and EL populations, reflecting the higher quality of the new map. The current map consists of 34 linkage groups and covers at least 29 of the 38 autosomes. Sex-specific analysis and comparisons of the maps based on the three individual populations showed prominent heterogeneity in recombination rates between populations, but no significant heterogeneity between sexes. The recombination rates in the F(1) Red Jungle fowl/White Leghorn males and females were significantly lower compared with those in the WU broiler population, consistent with a higher recombination rate in purebred domestic animals under strong artificial selection. The recombination rate varied considerably among chromosomes as well as along individual chromosomes. An analysis of the sequence composition at recombination hot and cold spots revealed a strong positive correlation between GC-rich sequences and high recombination rates. The GC-rich cohesin binding sites in particular stood out from other GC-rich sequences with a 3.4-fold higher density at recombination hot spots versus cold spots, suggesting a functional relationship between recombination frequency and cohesin binding.

Citing Articles

The recombination landscape of the barn owl, from families to populations.

Topaloudis A, Cumer T, Lavanchy E, Ducrest A, Simon C, Machado A Genetics. 2024; 229(1):1-50.

PMID: 39545468 PMC: 11708917. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae190.


A molecular mechanism for bright color variation in parrots.

Arbore R, Barbosa S, Brejcha J, Ogawa Y, Liu Y, Nicolai M Science. 2024; 386(6721):eadp7710.

PMID: 39480920 PMC: 7617403. DOI: 10.1126/science.adp7710.


Interference length reveals regularity of crossover placement across species.

Ernst M, Mercier R, Zwicker D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8973.

PMID: 39419967 PMC: 11487058. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53054-2.


The Genetic Architecture of Recombination Rates is Polygenic and Differs Between the Sexes in Wild House Sparrows (Passer domesticus).

McAuley J, Servin B, Burnett H, Brekke C, Peters L, Hagen I Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39183719 PMC: 11385585. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae179.


Impact of feralization on evolutionary trajectories in the genomes of feral cat island populations.

Nieto-Blazquez M, Gomez-Suarez M, Pfenninger M, Koch K PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308724.

PMID: 39137187 PMC: 11321585. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308724.


References
1.
Matise T, Chen F, Chen W, De La Vega F, Hansen M, He C . A second-generation combined linkage physical map of the human genome. Genome Res. 2007; 17(12):1783-6. PMC: 2099587. DOI: 10.1101/gr.7156307. View

2.
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C . Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals. Mamm Genome. 2001; 12(4):318-22. DOI: 10.1007/s003350020005. View

3.
Williams C, Goodman M, Stuber C . Comparative recombination distances among Zea mays L. inbreds, wide crosses and interspecific hybrids. Genetics. 1995; 141(4):1573-81. PMC: 1206888. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1573. View

4.
Gordon L, Yang S, Tran-Gyamfi M, Baggott D, Christensen M, Hamilton A . Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions. Genome Res. 2007; 17(11):1603-13. PMC: 2045143. DOI: 10.1101/gr.6775107. View

5.
Wallis J, Aerts J, Groenen M, Crooijmans R, Layman D, Graves T . A physical map of the chicken genome. Nature. 2004; 432(7018):761-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature03030. View