» Articles » PMID: 19076390

Visual Skills and Cross-modal Plasticity in Deaf Readers: Possible Implications for Acquiring Meaning from Print

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19076390
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most research on reading skill acquisition in deaf individuals has been conducted from the perspective of a hearing child learning to read. This approach may limit our understanding of how a deaf child approaches the task of learning to read and successfully acquires reading skills. An alternative approach is to consider how the cognitive skills that a deaf child brings to the reading task may influence the route by which he or she achieves reading fluency. A review of the literature on visual spatial attention suggests that deaf individuals are more distracted by visual information in the parafovea and periphery. We discuss how this may have an influence upon the perceptual processing of written text in deaf students.

Citing Articles

Significantly different noun-verb distinguishing mechanisms in written Chinese and Chinese sign language: An event-related potential study of bilingual native signers.

Xu L, Gong T, Shuai L, Feng J Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:910263.

PMID: 36389247 PMC: 9643713. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.910263.


Unveiling teachers' beliefs on visual cognition and learning styles of deaf and hard of hearing students: A Portuguese-Swedish study.

Rodrigues F, Rato J, Mineiro A, Holmstrom I PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263216.

PMID: 35167582 PMC: 9116990. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263216.


The neurocognitive basis of skilled reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults.

Emmorey K, Lee B Lang Linguist Compass. 2021; 15(2).

PMID: 34306178 PMC: 8302003. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12407.


Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students.

Tao J, Qin Z, Meng Z, Zhang L, Liu L, Yan G PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0221891.

PMID: 31513606 PMC: 6742358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221891.


Brain Plasticity Can Predict the Cochlear Implant Outcome in Adult-Onset Deafness.

Han J, Lee H, Kang H, Oh S, Lee D Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:38.

PMID: 30837852 PMC: 6389609. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00038.


References
1.
MYKLEBUST H, BRUTTEN M . A study of the visual perception of deaf children. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1953; 105:1-126. View

2.
Neville H, Bavelier D, Corina D, Rauschecker J, Karni A, Lalwani A . Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(3):922-9. PMC: 33817. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.922. View

3.
Finney E, Dobkins K . Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 11(1):171-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00082-3. View

4.
Thorpe A, Ashmead D, Rothpletz A . Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45(2):403-13. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/032). View

5.
Martini A, Mazzoli M, Kimberling W . An introduction to the genetics of normal and defective hearing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998; 830:361-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51908.x. View