» Articles » PMID: 19070238

Comparison of Model and Human Observer Performance for Detection and Discrimination Tasks Using Dual-energy X-ray Images

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19070238
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Model observer performance, computed theoretically using cascaded systems analysis (CSA), was compared to the performance of human observers in detection and discrimination tasks. Dual-energy (DE) imaging provided a wide range of acquisition and decomposition parameters for which observer performance could be predicted and measured. This work combined previously derived observer models (e.g., Fisher-Hotelling and non-prewhitening) with CSA modeling of the DE image noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) and imaging task (e.g., sphere detection, shape discrimination, and texture discrimination) to yield theoretical predictions of detectability index (d') and area under the receiver operating characteristic (Az). Theoretical predictions were compared to human observer performance assessed using 9-alternative forced-choice tests to yield measurement of Az as a function of DE image acquisition parameters (viz., allocation of dose between the low- and high-energy images) and decomposition technique [viz., three DE image decomposition algorithms: standard log subtraction (SLS), simple-smoothing of the high-energy image (SSH), and anti-correlated noise reduction (ACNR)]. Results showed good agreement between theory and measurements over a broad range of imaging conditions. The incorporation of an eye filter and internal noise in the observer models demonstrated improved correspondence with human observer performance. Optimal acquisition and decomposition parameters were shown to depend on the imaging task; for example, ACNR and SSH yielded the greatest performance in the detection of soft-tissue and bony lesions, respectively. This study provides encouraging evidence that Fourier-based modeling of NEQ computed via CSA and imaging task provides a good approximation to human observer performance for simple imaging tasks, helping to bridge the gap between Fourier metrics of detector performance (e.g., NEQ) and human observer performance.

Citing Articles

Photon-counting computed tomography versus energy-integrating computed tomography for detection of small liver lesions: comparison using a virtual framework imaging.

Felice N, Wildman-Tobriner B, Segars W, Bashir M, Marin D, Samei E J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(5):053502.

PMID: 39430123 PMC: 11486217. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.5.053502.


A Physics-Informed Deep Neural Network for Harmonization of CT Images.

Zarei M, Paima S, Sotoudeh-Paima S, McCabe C, Abadi E, Samei E IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 71(12):3494-3504.

PMID: 39012733 PMC: 11735689. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3428399.


Maximizing microcalcification detectability in low-dose dedicated cone-beam breast CT: parallel cascades-based theoretical analysis.

Larsen T, Tseng H, Trinate R, Fu Z, Chiang J, Karellas A J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(3):033501.

PMID: 38756437 PMC: 11095120. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.3.033501.


Discrimination tasks in simulated low-dose CT noise.

Abbey C, Samuelson F, Zeng R, Boone J, Myers K, Eckstein M Med Phys. 2023; 50(7):4151-4172.

PMID: 37057360 PMC: 11181787. DOI: 10.1002/mp.16412.


Assessment of Boundary Discrimination Performance in a Printed Phantom.

Abbey C, Li J, Gang G, Stayman J Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023; 12035.

PMID: 37051612 PMC: 10089594. DOI: 10.1117/12.2612622.


References
1.
Burgess A, Li X, Abbey C . Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997; 14(9):2420-42. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.002420. View

2.
Richard S, Siewerdsen J, Jaffray D, Moseley D, Bakhtiar B . Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. Med Phys. 2005; 32(5):1397-413. DOI: 10.1118/1.1901203. View

3.
Kappadath S, Shaw C . Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections. Med Phys. 2005; 32(11):3395-408. DOI: 10.1118/1.2064767. View

4.
Richard S, Siewerdsen J . Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging. Med Phys. 2008; 35(2):586-601. DOI: 10.1118/1.2826556. View

5.
Fischbach F, Freund T, Rottgen R, Engert U, Felix R, Ricke J . Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(6):1519-24. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811519. View