» Articles » PMID: 19052325

Comparative Genomics and Molecular Dynamics of DNA Repeats in Eukaryotes

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2008 Dec 5
PMID 19052325
Citations 231
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repeated elements can be widely abundant in eukaryotic genomes, composing more than 50% of the human genome, for example. It is possible to classify repeated sequences into two large families, "tandem repeats" and "dispersed repeats." Each of these two families can be itself divided into subfamilies. Dispersed repeats contain transposons, tRNA genes, and gene paralogues, whereas tandem repeats contain gene tandems, ribosomal DNA repeat arrays, and satellite DNA, itself subdivided into satellites, minisatellites, and microsatellites. Remarkably, the molecular mechanisms that create and propagate dispersed and tandem repeats are specific to each class and usually do not overlap. In the present review, we have chosen in the first section to describe the nature and distribution of dispersed and tandem repeats in eukaryotic genomes in the light of complete (or nearly complete) available genome sequences. In the second part, we focus on the molecular mechanisms responsible for the fast evolution of two specific classes of tandem repeats: minisatellites and microsatellites. Given that a growing number of human neurological disorders involve the expansion of a particular class of microsatellites, called trinucleotide repeats, a large part of the recent experimental work on microsatellites has focused on these particular repeats, and thus we also review the current knowledge in this area. Finally, we propose a unified definition for mini- and microsatellites that takes into account their biological properties and try to point out new directions that should be explored in a near future on our road to understanding the genetics of repeated sequences.

Citing Articles

Genome mining the black-yeast Aureobasidium pullulans NRRL 62031 for biotechnological traits.

Xiao D, Driller M, Stein K, Blank L, Tiso T BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):244.

PMID: 40082747 PMC: 11905612. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11395-2.


What are microsatellites and how to choose the best tool: a user-friendly review of SSR and 74 SSR mining tools.

Alves S, Dantas C, Macedo D, Ramos R Front Genet. 2024; 15:1474611.

PMID: 39606018 PMC: 11599195. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1474611.


[Microsatellite instability-What should be considered in routine examinations?].

Dietmaier W, Hirsch D, Ruschoff J Pathologie (Heidelb). 2024; 46(2):122-125.

PMID: 39560760 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01392-9.


Structure and Evolution of Ribosomal Genes of Insect Chromosomes.

Gokhman V, Kuznetsova V Insects. 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39194798 PMC: 11354594. DOI: 10.3390/insects15080593.


A pilot study on the detection of microsatellite instability using long mononucleotide repeats in solid tumors.

Liu T, Ho C, Chen Y, Chen P, Chen W, Lee C Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(3):445.

PMID: 39099584 PMC: 11294907. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14578.


References
1.
Galagan J, Selker E . RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. Trends Genet. 2004; 20(9):417-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.007. View

2.
Jankowski C, Nag D . Most meiotic CAG repeat tract-length alterations in yeast are SPO11 dependent. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002; 267(1):64-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-001-0635-4. View

3.
Sinclair D, Mills K, Guarente L . Accelerated aging and nucleolar fragmentation in yeast sgs1 mutants. Science. 1997; 277(5330):1313-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1313. View

4.
Sapolsky R, Brendel V, Karlin S . A comparative analysis of distinctive features of yeast protein sequences. Yeast. 1993; 9(12):1287-98. DOI: 10.1002/yea.320091202. View

5.
Bachtrog D, Weiss S, Zangerl B, Brem G, Schlotterer C . Distribution of dinucleotide microsatellites in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Mol Biol Evol. 1999; 16(5):602-10. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026142. View