» Articles » PMID: 19021608

Do Nomograms Predict Aggressive Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy More Accurately Than Biochemical Recurrence Alone?

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2008 Nov 22
PMID 19021608
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the predictive accuracy (PA) of existing models in estimating risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) vs aggressive recurrence (BCR with a prostate-specific antigen, PSA, doubling time, DT, of <9 months).

Patients And Methods: The study included 1550 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1988 and 2007 within the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. The PA of nine different risk stratification models for estimating risk of BCR and risk of aggressive recurrence after RP was assessed using the concordance index, c.

Results: The 10-year risks of BCR and aggressive recurrence were 47% and 9%, respectively. Across all nine models tested, the PA was a mean (range) of 0.054 (0.024-0.074) points higher for predicting aggressive recurrence than for predicting BCR alone (c = 0.756 vs 0.702). Similar results were obtained in four sensitivity analyses: (i) defining patients with BCR but unavailable PSADT (220) as having aggressive recurrence; (ii) defining these patients as not having aggressive recurrence; (iii) defining aggressive recurrence as a PSADT of <6 months; or (iv) defining aggressive recurrence as a PSADT of <12 months. The improvement in PA was greater for preoperative than for postoperative models (0.053 vs 0.036, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Across nine different models the prediction of aggressive recurrence after RP was more accurate than the prediction of BCR alone. This is probably because current models mainly assess cancer biology, which correlates better with aggressive recurrence than with BCR alone. Overall, all models had relatively similar accuracy for predicting aggressive recurrence.

Citing Articles

Positive STAT5 Protein and Locus Amplification Status Predicts Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy to Assist Clinical Precision Management of Prostate Cancer.

Haddad B, Erickson A, Udhane V, LaViolette P, Rone J, Kallajoki M Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019; 28(10):1642-1651.

PMID: 31292140 PMC: 6774884. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1358.


Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Preoperative Score Versus Postoperative Score (CAPRA-S): ability to predict cancer progression and decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy.

Seo W, Kang P, Kang D, Yoon J, Kim W, Chung J J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29(9):1212-6.

PMID: 25246738 PMC: 4168173. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.9.1212.


Do nomograms designed to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) do a better job of predicting more clinically relevant prostate cancer outcomes than BCR? A report from the SEARCH database group.

Teeter A, Presti Jr J, Aronson W, Terris M, Kane C, Amling C Urology. 2013; 82(1):53-8.

PMID: 23806388 PMC: 3774016. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.090.


Recent changes in the clinicopathologic features of Korean men with prostate cancer: a comparison with Western populations.

Byun S, Lee S, Lee S, Lee E, Seo S, Lee H Yonsei Med J. 2012; 53(3):543-9.

PMID: 22476998 PMC: 3343449. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.3.543.


The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Cooperberg M, Hilton J, Carroll P Cancer. 2011; 117(22):5039-46.

PMID: 21647869 PMC: 3170662. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26169.


References
1.
DAmico A, Chen M, Roehl K, Catalona W . Identifying patients at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(22):4975-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.904. View

2.
Cooperberg M, Pasta D, Elkin E, Litwin M, Latini D, Du Chane J . The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005; 173(6):1938-42. PMC: 2948569. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7. View

3.
Kattan M, Eastham J, Stapleton A, Wheeler T, Scardino P . A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(10):766-71. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.10.766. View

4.
Teeter A, Banez L, Presti Jr J, Aronson W, Terris M, Kane C . What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group. J Urol. 2008; 180(5):1980-4. PMC: 3182520. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.031. View

5.
Lin D, Schultz D, Renshaw A, Rubin M, Richie J, DAmico A . Predictors of short postoperative prostate-specific antigen doubling time for patients diagnosed during PSA era. Urology. 2005; 65(3):528-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.041. View