Altering School Climate Through School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a Group-randomized Effectiveness Trial

Overview

Journal Prev Sci

Specialty Science

Date 2008 Nov 18

PMID 19011963

Citations 37

Authors

Catherine P Bradshaw

Christine W Koth

Leslie A Thornton

Philip J Leaf

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a universal, school-wide prevention strategy that is currently implemented in over 7,500 schools to reduce disruptive behavior problems. The present study examines the impact of PBIS on staff reports of school organizational health using data from a group-randomized controlled effectiveness trial of PBIS conducted in 37 elementary schools. Longitudinal multilevel analyses on data from 2,596 staff revealed a significant effect of PBIS on the schools' overall organizational health, resource influence, staff affiliation, and academic emphasis over the 5-year trial; the effects on collegial leadership and institutional integrity were significant when implementation fidelity was included in the model. Trained schools that adopted PBIS the fastest tended to have higher levels of organizational health at baseline, but the later-implementing schools tended to experience the greatest improvements in organizational health after implementing PBIS. This study indicated that changes in school organizational health are important consequences of the PBIS whole-school prevention model, and may in turn be a potential contextual mediator of the effect of PBIS on student performance.

Citing Articles

Pupils' aggressive behaviour towards teachers: identifying protective factors at organizational level examined in a follow-up study.

Andersen L, Aust B, Winding T BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):247.

PMID: 40082990 PMC: 11907950. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02564-9.

Training and Technical Assistance Increase the Fidelity of Implementation of a Universal Prevention Initiative in Rural Schools: Results from a 3-Year Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Calvert H, Fleming C, Lowe M, Lewis T, Siebert C, Havlicak A Prev Sci. 2025; 26(1):56-68.

PMID: 39899222 PMC: 11811254. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-025-01776-0.

Core Components and Implementation Determinants of Multilevel Service Delivery Frameworks Across Child Mental Health Service Settings.

Moore S, Cooper J, Malloy J, Lyon A Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023; 51(2):172-195.

PMID: 38117431 PMC: 10850020. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01320-8.

How students' writing motivation, teachers' personal and professional attributes, and writing instruction impact student writing achievement: a two-level hierarchical linear modeling study.

Wang H, Troia G Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1213929.

PMID: 37546448 PMC: 10398962. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213929.

Effects of trauma-informed approaches in schools: A systematic review.

Maynard B, Farina A, Dell N, Kelly M Campbell Syst Rev. 2023; 15(1-2):e1018.

PMID: 37131480 PMC: 8356508. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1018.

References

Payne A, Gottfredson D, Gottfredson G . School predictors of the intensity of implementation of school-based prevention programs: results from a national study. Prev Sci. 2006; 7(2):225-37. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-006-0029-2. View

Hill L, Maucione K, Hood B . A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prev Sci. 2006; 8(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-006-0051-4. View

Schoenwald S, Hoagwood K . Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: what matters when?. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(9):1190-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1190. View

Glisson C . The organizational context of children's mental health services. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002; 5(4):233-53. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020972906177. View

Gottfredson G, Jones E, Gore T . Implementation and evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention to prevent problem behavior in a disorganized school. Prev Sci. 2002; 3(1):43-56. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014671310038. View

Durlak J, DuPre E . Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3-4):327-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0. View

Dane A, Schneider B . Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998; 18(1):23-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00043-3. View

Hohmann A, Shear M . Community-based intervention research: coping with the "noise" of real life in study design. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(2):201-7. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.201. View

Domitrovich C, Bradshaw C, Poduska J, Hoagwood K, Buckley J, Olin S . Maximizing the Implementation Quality of Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions in Schools: A Conceptual Framework. Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2016; 1(3):6-28. PMC: 4865398. DOI: 10.1080/1754730x.2008.9715730. View

10.

Bevans K, Bradshaw C, Miech R, Leaf P . Staff- and school-level predictors of school organizational health: a multilevel analysis. J Sch Health. 2007; 77(6):294-302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00210.x. View

11.

Jo B . Statistical power in randomized intervention studies with noncompliance. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2):178-93. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.178. View

12.

Glisson C, Hemmelgarn A . The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. Child Abuse Negl. 1998; 22(5):401-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2134(98)00005-2. View

13.

Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen W . A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(2):237-56. DOI: 10.1093/her/18.2.237. View

14.

Lindsley O . Why aren't effective teaching tools widely adopted?. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992; 25(1):21-6. PMC: 1279644. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-21. View

15.

Aarons G, Sawitzky A . Organizational Culture and Climate and Mental Health Provider Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice. Psychol Serv. 2006; 3(1):61-72. PMC: 1712666. DOI: 10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61. View

16.

Muthen B, Muthen L . The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. J Stud Alcohol. 2000; 61(2):290-300. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.290. View