» Articles » PMID: 19011262

Oesophageal Seal of the Novel Supralaryngeal Airway Device I-Gel in Comparison with the Laryngeal Mask Airways Classic and ProSeal Using a Cadaver Model

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2008 Nov 18
PMID 19011262
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic (cLMA) and ProSeal (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure.

Methods: The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured.

Results: During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H(2)O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H(2)O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H(2)O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H(2)O, the cLMA of 46 cm H(2)O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H(2)O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel.

Conclusions: Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.

Citing Articles

Choice of supraglottic airway devices: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Kanakaraj M, Bhat A, Singh N, Balasubramanian S, Tyagi A, Aathreya R Br J Anaesth. 2024; 133(6):1284-1306.

PMID: 39406569 PMC: 11589487. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.001.


Airway Management During Diagnostic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparison of I-Gel and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway.

Sule M, Salahu D, Atiku M, Abdurrahman A, Mohammed A, Abdullahi M J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024; 13(4):34-39.

PMID: 38449541 PMC: 10914103. DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_15_23.


I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel.

Chaki T, Tachibana S, Kumita S, Sato S, Hirahata T, Ikeshima Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18381.

PMID: 37884591 PMC: 10603072. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45631-0.


Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.

Salhotra R, Padhy A, Rautela R, Singh D Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 67(5):426-431.

PMID: 37333703 PMC: 10269987. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_203_22.


The reality of advanced airway management during out of hospital cardiac arrest; why did paramedics deviate from their allocated airway management strategy during the AIRWAYS-2 randomised trial?.

Kirby K, Lazaroo M, Green J, Hall H, Pilbery R, Whitley G Resusc Plus. 2023; 13:100365.

PMID: 36860989 PMC: 9969270. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100365.