Field Validation of Listings of Food Stores and Commercial Physical Activity Establishments from Secondary Data
Overview
Orthopedics
Social Sciences
Affiliations
Background: Food- and activity-related establishments are increasingly viewed as neighbourhood resources that potentially condition health-related behaviour. The primary objective of the current study was to establish, using ground truthing (on-site verification), the validity of measures of availability of food stores and physical activity establishments that were obtained from commercial database and Internet searches. A secondary objective was to examine differences in validity results according to neighbourhood characteristics and commercial establishment categories.
Methods: Lists of food stores and physical activity-related establishments in 12 census tracts within the Montreal metropolitan region were compiled using a commercial database (n = 171 establishments) and Internet search engines (n = 123 establishments). Ground truthing through field observations was performed to assess the presence of listed establishments and identify those absent. Percentage agreement, sensitivity (proportion of establishments found in the field that were listed), and positive predictive value (proportion of listed establishments found in the field) were calculated and contrasted according to data sources, census tracts characteristics, and establishment categories.
Results: Agreement with field observations was good (0.73) for the commercial list, and moderate (0.60) for the Internet-based list. The commercial list was superior to the Internet-based list for correctly listing establishments present in the field (sensitivity), but slightly inferior in terms of the likelihood that a listed establishment was present in the field (positive predictive value). Agreement was higher for food stores than for activity-related establishments.
Conclusion: Commercial data sources may provide a valid alternative to field observations and could prove a valuable tool in the evaluation of commercial environments relevant to eating behaviour. In contrast, this study did not find strong evidence in support of commercial and Internet data sources to represent neighbourhood opportunities for active lifestyle.
Cafruni C, Garcez A, Backes V, Henn R, Bairros F, Dias-da-Costa J Cad Saude Publica. 2025; 40(11):e00061124.
PMID: 39775771 PMC: 11654106. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XEN061124.
What is in a food store name? Leveraging large language models to enhance food environment data.
Etheredge A, Hosmer S, Crossa A, Suss R, Torrey M Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1476950.
PMID: 39712471 PMC: 11660183. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1476950.
Urban Form Metrics for Promoting Walking: Street Layouts and Destinations.
Koohsari M, Oka K, Nakaya T, McCormack G J Urban Health. 2023; 100(5):1024-1031.
PMID: 37581709 PMC: 10618131. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-023-00775-2.
National trends and disparities in retail food environments in the USA between 1990 and 2014.
Hirsch J, Zhao Y, Melly S, Moore K, Berger N, Quinn J Public Health Nutr. 2023; 26(5):1052-1062.
PMID: 36644895 PMC: 10191888. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023000058.
Automatic classification of takeaway food outlet cuisine type using machine (deep) learning.
Bishop T, von Hinke S, Hollingsworth B, Lake A, Brown H, Burgoine T Mach Learn Appl. 2022; 6:None.
PMID: 34977839 PMC: 8700226. DOI: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100106.