» Articles » PMID: 19000051

MRI and (1)H MRS of the Breast: Presence of a Choline Peak As Malignancy Marker is Related to K21 Value of the Tumor in Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Breast J
Publisher Wiley
Date 2008 Nov 13
PMID 19000051
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assess which specific morphologic features, enhancement patterns, or pharmacokinetic parameters on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could predict a false-negative outcome of Proton MR Spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) exam in patients with invasive breast cancer. Sixteen patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast were prospectively included and underwent both, contrast-enhanced breast MRI and (1)H MRS examination of the breast. The MR images were reviewed and the lesions morphologic features, enhancement patterns and pharmacokinetic parameters (k21-value) were scored according to the ACR BI-RADS-MRI lexicon criteria. For the in vivo MRS studies, each spectrum was evaluated for the presence of choline based on consensus reading. Breast MRI and (1)H MRS data were compared to histopathologic findings. In vivo (1)H MRS detected a choline peak in 14/16 (88%) cancers. A false-negative (1)H MRS study occurred in 2/16 (14%) cancer patients. K21 values differed between both groups: the 14 choline positive cancers had k21 values ranging from 0.01 to 0.20/second (mean 0.083/second), whereas the two choline-negative cancers showed k21 values of 0.03 and 0.05/second, respectively (mean 0.040/second). Also enhancement kinetics did differ between both groups; typically both cancers that were choline-negative showed a late phase plateau (100%), whereas this was only shown in 5/14 (36%) of the choline positive cases. There was no difference between both groups with regard to morphologic features on MRI. This study showed that false-negative (1)H MRS examinations do occur in breast cancer patients, and that the presence of a choline peak on (1)H MRS as malignancy marker is related to the k21 value of the invasive tumor being imaged.

Citing Articles

Novel Technologies in Breast Imaging: A Scoping Review.

Grigoryants N, Sass S, Alexander J Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e44061.

PMID: 37746370 PMC: 10517733. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44061.


Differential diagnosis of plasma cell mastitis and invasive ductal carcinoma using multiparametric MRI.

Chen R, Hu B, Zhang Y, Liu C, Zhao L, Jiang Y Gland Surg. 2020; 9(2):278-290.

PMID: 32420252 PMC: 7225459. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.30.


Imaging Cancer Metabolism.

Momcilovic M, Shackelford D Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2017; 26(1):81-92.

PMID: 29212309 PMC: 5746040. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.220.


Cancer metabolic reprogramming: importance, main features, and potentials for precise targeted anti-cancer therapies.

Phan L, Yeung S, Lee M Cancer Biol Med. 2014; 11(1):1-19.

PMID: 24738035 PMC: 3969803. DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.01.001.


In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Begley J, Redpath T, Bolan P, Gilbert F Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14(2):207.

PMID: 22515594 PMC: 3446370. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3132.


References
1.
Star-Lack J, Nelson S, Kurhanewicz J, Huang L, Vigneron D . Improved water and lipid suppression for 3D PRESS CSI using RF band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (BASING). Magn Reson Med. 1997; 38(2):311-21. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910380222. View

2.
Orel S, SCHNALL M . MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001; 220(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113. View

3.
Knopp M, Weiss E, Sinn H, Mattern J, Junkermann H, Radeleff J . Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 10(3):260-6. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199909)10:3<260::aid-jmri6>3.0.co;2-7. View

4.
Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, Besnard P, Zonderland H, Obdeijn I . Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(5):427-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031759. View

5.
Robson M, Offit K . Breast MRI for women with hereditary cancer risk. JAMA. 2004; 292(11):1368-70. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1368. View