» Articles » PMID: 18997682

The Association of Obesity and Cervical Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2008 Nov 11
PMID 18997682
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Obese women are at an increased risk of death from cervical cancer, but the explanation for this is unknown. Through our systematic review, we sought to determine whether obesity is associated with cervical cancer screening and whether this association differs by race. We identified original articles evaluating the relationship between body weight and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing in the United States through electronic (PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library) and manual searching. We excluded studies in special populations or those not written in English. Two reviewers sequentially extracted study data and independently extracted quality using standardized forms. A total of 4,132 citations yielded 11 relevant studies. Ten studies suggested an inverse association between obesity and cervical cancer screening. Compared to women with a normal BMI, the combined odds ratios (95% CI) for Pap testing were 0.91 (0.80-1.03), 0.81 (0.70-0.93), 0.75 (0.64-0.88), and 0.62 (0.55-0.69) for the overweight and class I, class II, and class III obesity categories, respectively. Three out of four studies that presented the results by race found this held true for white women, but no study found this for black women. In conclusion, obese women are less likely to report being screened for cervical cancer than their lean counterparts, and this does not hold true for black women. Less screening may partly explain the higher cervical cancer mortality seen in obese white women.

Citing Articles

Patient perceived weight stigma and patient-centered language use preferences: A cross-sectional mixed methods analysis conducted in a large academic medical center.

Kane R, Williams S, Reynolds K, Kincanon A, Hager M, McDougall C PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314269.

PMID: 39928592 PMC: 11809864. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314269.


The acceptability of combined management of comorbid obesity and back pain in a rural population: a mediation analysis.

Haggerty T, Pilkerton C, Dekeseredy P, Cowher A, Sedney C Pain Manag. 2025; 15(2):73-80.

PMID: 39901766 PMC: 11853547. DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2460961.


Disparities in Cervical Cancer Among LHS+ Women: A Primer for Medical Students.

Conde Toro A, Velez Figueroa A, Baez Cruz A, Grau Rodriguez M, Montalvo Rivera E, Collazo Irizarry D MedEdPORTAL. 2024; 20:11482.

PMID: 39720160 PMC: 11668185. DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11482.


Opportunities for General Internal Medicine to Promote Equity in Obesity Care.

Kane R, Nicklas J, Schwartz J, Bramante C, Yancy Jr W, Gudzune K J Gen Intern Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39414737 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09084-z.


A study on obese patients' participation in cancer screening programs: an example from Turkey.

Turkoglu S, Ozen M, Eke R, Acar A Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(8):e20240261.

PMID: 39166675 PMC: 11329256. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240261.


References
1.
Wee C, Phillips R, McCarthy E . BMI and cervical cancer screening among white, African-American, and Hispanic women in the United States. Obes Res. 2005; 13(7):1275-80. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2005.152. View

2.
Fontaine K, Faith M, Allison D, Cheskin L . Body weight and health care among women in the general population. Arch Fam Med. 1998; 7(4):381-4. DOI: 10.1001/archfami.7.4.381. View

3.
Amy N, Aalborg A, Lyons P, Keranen L . Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 30(1):147-55. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803105. View

4.
McGovern P, Lurie N, Margolis K, SLATER J . Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14(3):201-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00076-7. View

5.
Winkleby M, Snider J, Davis B, Jennings M, Ahn D . Cancer-related health behaviors and screening practices among Latinos: findings from a community and agricultural labor camp survey. Ethn Dis. 2003; 13(3):376-86. View