» Articles » PMID: 18991171

Palatal Fistulas After Primary Repair of Clefts of the Secondary Palate

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Nov 11
PMID 18991171
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our aim was to assess whether severity of cleft, age at the time of repair, and the operating surgeon's experience contributed to the development of fistulas in patients with clefts of the secondary palate. We studied 814 children born between 1960 and 1999 with clefts of the secondary palate who had had their primary operation at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Data were collected retrospectively from the archives of the Oslo Cleft Team. Palatal fistulas developed in 36 patients (4%), among whom 17 patients required correction (2% of the total). The incidence of fistulas was not related to sex. Patients with clefts of the hard and soft palate developed fistulas more often than patients with clefts of the soft palate only (8% compared with 1%, p<0.001). Patients with submucous cleft palates developed fistulas significantly more often than patients with clefts of the soft palate only (5% compared with 1%, p=0.02). Among patients with clefts of the hard and soft palate, the incidence of fistulas increased significantly with increasing age at the time of palatal closure (p=0.005). The incidence decreased significantly the more experienced the operating surgeon was for treating clefts of the hard and soft palate (p<0.001) but not for submucous clefts. Among patients with clefts of the hard and soft palate who had the palate closed at 14 months of age or later, the incidence of fistulas decreased from 21% when the operating surgeon had little experience to 0 when the surgeon had much experience. The incidence of fistulas was related to severity of cleft, age at palatal closure, and the operating surgeon's experience.

Citing Articles

Analysis of risk factors affecting poor wound healing after primary cleft palate surgery.

Wu M, Yin H, Chen L, Shi B, Li Y Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 41(6):719-724.

PMID: 38597039 PMC: 10722446. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023117.


Economic Evaluation of a Global Reconstructive Surgery Visiting Educator Program.

Luan A, Meyers N, Le Thua T, Dang H, Phu Q, Auten B Ann Surg Open. 2023; 3(3):e181.

PMID: 37601156 PMC: 10431359. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000181.


Evaluation of the effect of a resorbable membrane on the closure of palatal fistulas.

Wang Y, Yang F, Liu W, Fan X, Lu Y Front Surg. 2023; 10:1134934.

PMID: 36925507 PMC: 10011083. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1134934.


Cleft Palate Fistula: A Review.

Buller M, Jodeh D, Qamar F, Wright J, Halsey J, Rottgers S Eplasty. 2023; 23:e7.

PMID: 36817364 PMC: 9912053.


Incidence of fistula after primary cleft palate repair: a 25-year assessment of one surgeon's experience.

Park M, Seo H, Bae Y Arch Plast Surg. 2022; 49(1):43-49.

PMID: 35086308 PMC: 8795648. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2021.01396.