» Articles » PMID: 18955430

How Much Do the Benefits Cost? Effects of a Home-based Training Programme on Cardiovascular Fitness, Quality of Life, Programme Cost and Adherence for Patients with Coronary Disease

Overview
Journal Clin Rehabil
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2008 Oct 29
PMID 18955430
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate cost, adherence and effects on cardiovascular function and quality of life of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with coronary disease.

Design: A randomized, prospective controlled trial.

Setting: Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Brazil.

Subjects: Thirty-nine low-risk patients were assigned to a home exercise training group (n = 19) or a control group (n = 20).

Interventions: The home group performed home-based training for three months with biweekly telephone monitoring.

Main Outcome Measures: The aerobic capacity and the quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)) of all patients were evaluated before and after the three-month period. Adherence was evaluated weekly. Programme cost was estimated using the Brazilian Classification of Medical Procedures.

Results: After training, the home group had higher peak Vo2 from 28.8 (6.4) to 31.7 (8.1) mL/kg per minute, peak heart rate from 135 (22) to 143 (20) bpm, work rate from 4780 (2021) to 7103 (3057) kpm/min and exercise time from 11.5 (1.9) to 13.6 (2.3) minutes (P < or = .05). The control group showed reduction in peak Vo2 from 28.6 (6.6) to 26.8 (7.2) mL/kg per minute, peak Vo2 pulse from 15.5 (3.9) to 14.3 (3.8) mL/bpm and exercise time from 11.5 (2.3) to 11.4 (2.7) minutes (P < or = 0.05). The home group reported improvements in all domains of SF-36. The control group showed improvement in only three domains of SF-36. In the home group the average cost per patient was US$502.71 and the adherence achieved 100%.

Conclusion: The programme seems to provide an efficient low-cost approach to cardiac rehabilitation in low-risk patients.

Citing Articles

A comparison of conventional intervention and home-based approach with head-mounted device for cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgery.

Yen L, Chen H, Rezaei A, Lien H, Nikkhoo M, Cheng C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8099.

PMID: 40057588 PMC: 11890783. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91555-2.


Effect of Resistance Training on Body Composition, Hemodynamic Parameters and Exercise Tolerance among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.

Sharma A, Sharma N, Vats S, Jain M, Chahal A, Kashoo F Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36611590 PMC: 9819119. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11010131.


Change in Latent Gray-Matter Structural Integrity Is Associated With Change in Cardiovascular Fitness in Older Adults Who Engage in At-Home Aerobic Exercise.

Polk S, Kleemeyer M, Kohncke Y, Brandmaier A, Bodammer N, Misgeld C Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:852737.

PMID: 35655926 PMC: 9152142. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.852737.


The role of cardiac rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Taylor R, Dalal H, McDonagh S Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021; 19(3):180-194.

PMID: 34531576 PMC: 8445013. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00611-7.


Efficacy and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Recovery Phase of Cardiovascular Diseases: Protocol for a Multicenter, Nonrandomized, Single-Arm, Interventional Trial.

Itoh H, Amiya E, Narita K, Shimbo M, Taya M, Komuro I JMIR Res Protoc. 2021; 10(10):e30725.

PMID: 34407925 PMC: 8524329. DOI: 10.2196/30725.