» Articles » PMID: 18925906

Association of Lower Costs of Pulsatile Machine Perfusion in Renal Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donors

Overview
Journal Am J Transplant
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Oct 18
PMID 18925906
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulsatile machine perfusion (PMP) has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF) in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Here, we investigate whether there is a cost benefit associated with PMP utilization in ECD kidney transplants. We analyzed United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data describing Medicare-insured ECD kidney transplant recipients in 1995-2004 (N = 5840). We examined total Medicare payments for transplant hospitalization and annually for 3 years posttransplant according to PMP utilization. After adjusting for other recipient, donor and transplant factors, PMP utilization was associated with a $2130 reduction (p = 0.007) in hospitalization costs. PMP utilization was also associated with lower DGF risk (p < 0.0001). PMP utilization did not predict differences in rejection, graft survival, patient survival, or costs at 1, 2 and 3 years posttransplant. PMP utilization is correlated with lower costs for the transplant hospitalization, which is likely due to the associated reduction in DGF among recipients of PMP kidneys. However, there is no difference in long-term Medicare costs for ECD recipients by PMP utilization. A prospective trial is necessary as it will help determine if the associations seen here are due to PMP utilization and not differences in the population studied.

Citing Articles

Factors Associated With the Use of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Goulamhoussen N, Slapcoff L, Baran D, Boucher A, Houde I, Masse M Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022; 9:20543581211048338.

PMID: 36062213 PMC: 9434662. DOI: 10.1177/20543581211048338.


Costs and Outcomes of Privately-Insured Kidney Transplant Recipients by Body Mass Index.

Ercole P, Buchanan P, Lentine K, Burroughs T, Schnitzler M, Modanlou K J Nephrol Ther. 2020; Suppl 4(SI Kidney Transplantation).

PMID: 32879752 PMC: 7462713. DOI: 10.4172/2161-0959.S4-003.


Machine preservation of donor kidneys in transplantation.

Patel S, Sener A, Bhattacharjee R, Luke P Transl Androl Urol. 2019; 8(2):118-125.

PMID: 31080771 PMC: 6503225. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.03.06.


Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.

Perez-Saez M, Montero N, Redondo-Pachon D, Crespo M, Pascual J Transplantation. 2017; 101(4):727-745.

PMID: 28072755 PMC: 7228607. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001635.


Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hameed A, Pleass H, Wong G, Hawthorne W Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(40):e5083.

PMID: 27749583 PMC: 5059086. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005083.


References
1.
Wolfe R, Ashby V, Milford E, Ojo A, Ettenger R, Agodoa L . Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(23):1725-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303. View

2.
Sung R, Christensen L, Leichtman A, Greenstein S, Distant D, Wynn J . Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8(4):783-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02157.x. View

3.
Ojo A, Hanson J, Meier-Kriesche H, Okechukwu C, Wolfe R, Leichtman A . Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12(3):589-597. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V123589. View

4.
St Peter S, Imber C, Friend P . Liver and kidney preservation by perfusion. Lancet. 2002; 359(9306):604-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07749-8. View

5.
Schnitzler M, Whiting J, Brennan D, Lin G, Chapman W, Lowell J . The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2003; 75(12):1940-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000076381.16276.1B. View