» Articles » PMID: 18852938

Human Papillomavirus Infection in Men Residing in Brazil, Mexico, and the USA

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2008 Oct 15
PMID 18852938
Citations 8
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess Human Papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution among men ages 18 years and older recruited from three different countries utilizing a common protocol for sampling HPV detection, and to evaluate whether HPV detection differs by age and country. MATERIAL AD METHODS: The study protocol includes a pre-enrollment run-in visit, a baseline (enrollment) visit, and nine additional visits after enrollment scheduled six months apart. For this analysis, the first 1160 men who completed both the run-in and baseline visit were included. To maximize sampling and prevent fraying of applicators, three different applicators were utilized to sample the external genitalia of participants among different anatomic sites. These samples were later combined to form a single sample for the detection of HPV using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for amplification of a fragment of the HPV L1 gene.

Results: Among 1160 men from Brazil, Mexico, and the United States (U.S.), overall HPV prevalence was 65.2%; with 12.0% oncogenic types only, 20.7% non-oncogenic types only, 17.8% both oncogenic and non-oncogenic, and 14.7% unclassified infections. Multiple HPV types were detected in 25.7% of study participants. HPV prevalence was higher in Brazil (72.3%) than in the U.S. (61.3%) and Mexico (61.9%). HPV 16 (6.5%), 51 (6.5%), and 59 (5.3%) were the most commonly detected oncogenic infections, and HPV 84 (7.7%), 62 (7.3%), and 6 (6.6%) were the most commonly detected non-oncogenic infections. Overall HPV prevalence was not associated with age. However, significant associations with age were observed when specific categories of oncogenic, non-oncogenic, and unclassified HPV infections were considered.

Conclusions: Studies of HPV type distribution among a broad age range of men from multiple countries is needed to fill the information gap internationally with respect to our knowledge of HPV infection in men.

Citing Articles

Epidemiology and Burden of Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases, Molecular Pathogenesis, and Vaccine Evaluation.

Kombe Kombe A, Li B, Zahid A, Mengist H, Bounda G, Zhou Y Front Public Health. 2021; 8:552028.

PMID: 33553082 PMC: 7855977. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.552028.


Prevalence and incidence of anal human papillomavirus infection in Mexican men: Need for universal prevention policies.

Posso H, Leon-Maldonado L, Allen-Leigh B, Salmeron J, Quiterio M, Giuliano A Salud Publica Mex. 2019; 60(6):645-652.

PMID: 30699269 PMC: 6642746. DOI: 10.21149/8454.


High prevalence of co-infection between human papillomavirus (HPV) 51 and 52 in Mexican population.

Gallegos-Bolanos J, Rivera-Dominguez J, Presno-Bernal J, Cervantes-Villagrana R BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1):531.

PMID: 28789619 PMC: 5549346. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3519-7.


Prevalence of DNA-HPV in male sexual partners of HPV-infected women and concordance of viral types in infected couples.

de Lima Rocha M, Faria F, Goncalves L, Souza M, Fernandes P, Fernandes A PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e40988.

PMID: 22815888 PMC: 3398875. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040988.


The prevalence of genital HPV and factors associated with oncogenic HPV among men having sex with men and men having sex with women and men: the HIM study.

Nyitray A, Carvalho da Silva R, Baggio M, Lu B, Smith D, Abrahamsen M Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38(10):932-40.

PMID: 21934568 PMC: 3178038. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822154f9.


References
1.
Cogliano V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F . Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(4):204. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70086-3. View

2.
Gravitt P, Peyton C, Apple R, Wheeler C . Genotyping of 27 human papillomavirus types by using L1 consensus PCR products by a single-hybridization, reverse line blot detection method. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36(10):3020-7. PMC: 105104. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.10.3020-3027.1998. View

3.
Bleeker M, Hogewoning C, Berkhof J, Voorhorst F, Hesselink A, van Diemen P . Concordance of specific human papillomavirus types in sex partners is more prevalent than would be expected by chance and is associated with increased viral loads. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(5):612-20. DOI: 10.1086/431978. View

4.
Hernandez B, McDuffie K, Goodman M, Wilkens L, Thompson P, Zhu X . Comparison of physician- and self-collected genital specimens for detection of human papillomavirus in men. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(2):513-7. PMC: 1392697. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.513-517.2006. View

5.
Rombaldi R, Serafini E, Villa L, Vanni A, Barea F, Frassini R . Infection with human papillomaviruses of sexual partners of women having cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006; 39(2):177-87. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006000200003. View