» Articles » PMID: 18850554

Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy with Reticulated Hyaluronic Acid Implant Versus Punch Trabeculectomy: a Prospective Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2008 Oct 14
PMID 18850554
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect and complication rate of nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with reticulated hyaluronic acid (SK-GEL) scleral implant versus traditional punch trabeculectomy (PT) in the management of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Prospective, randomized comparative study including 93 patients with uncontrolled POAG. Group 1 (43 eyes) underwent NPDS with SK-GEL scleral implant; Group 2 (50 eyes) underwent PT. Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL) was applied intraoperatively in both techniques. Study follow-up evaluations were conducted at 36 and 48 months. Complete success indicated the achievement of the target IOP without antiglaucoma medications, while qualified success indicated the same goal with medications. These categories were assessed at two target IOP levels, <21 mmHg and <18 mmHg.

Results: At 36 months for complete and qualified success with a <21 and <18 mmHg target IOP, no significant differences were noted between the two groups. At 48 months postprocedure when a <21 mmHg IOP target was considered, the rate of eyes that achieved complete success was 51.1% in the NPDS group versus 72% in the PT group (p<0.05). As for the <18 mmHg IOP target, the rate of eyes that achieved complete success was 32.5% in the NPDS group versus 44% in the PT group (p<0.05). Complications occurred significantly more frequently after PT than after NPDS.

Conclusions: The IOP-lowering effects of the two procedures were comparable at 36 months. At 48 months PT showed a significantly higher rate of complete success compared with NPDS. Complications were more frequent after PT than after NPDS.

Citing Articles

Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy in postoperative astigmatism: a meta-analysis.

Peng X, Ling Q, Duan X BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):381.

PMID: 39198787 PMC: 11351589. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03651-y.


Functional and Morphological Outcomes after Trabeculectomy and Deep Sclerectomy-Results from a Monocentric Registry Study.

Pfeiffer V, Gubser P, Shang X, Lincke J, Haner N, Zinkernagel M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201410 PMC: 10802181. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010101.


Trabeculectomy Vs Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Long-Term Report of 201 Eyes.

Correia Barbosa R, Goncalves R, Bastos R, Alves Pereira S, Basto R, Viana A Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:1619-1627.

PMID: 37304331 PMC: 10257434. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S405837.


Deep sclerectomy-trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in treating glaucoma: postoperative long-term results.

Chean C, Jiang L, Pati Arambage G, Ranjit P Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(12):1951-1959.

PMID: 36536976 PMC: 9729096. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.12.09.


Comparison of Long-Term Effects After Modified CO Laser-Assisted Deep Sclerectomy and Conventional Trabeculectomy in Chinese Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Zhang Y, Mao J, Zhou Q, Li L, Zhang S, Bian A Ophthalmol Ther. 2021; 11(1):321-331.

PMID: 34862960 PMC: 8770782. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-021-00413-7.