» Articles » PMID: 1878906

Ferromagnetism and Magnetic Resonance Artifacts of Platinum Embolization Microcoils

Overview
Date 1991 May 1
PMID 1878906
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed in vitro tests of ferromagnetism of platinum microcoils of two manufacturers. In addition, we performed in vitro magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on these two devices to determine their levels of magnetic susceptibility artifact production. We found that both devices were nonferromagnetic and produced a very low level of artifact during MRI. In vivo MRI of a dog and 2 patients having previous placement of platinum microcoils was performed without coil migration or significant artifact production. Platinum microcoils are highly MR-compatible.

Citing Articles

Influence of tongue muscle contraction and transmural pressure on nasopharyngeal geometry in the rat.

Fregosi R J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011; 111(3):766-74.

PMID: 21719721 PMC: 3174786. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01501.2010.


2D Fast Spoiled Gradient Echo (2D-FSPGR) Gd-DTPA Enhanced Dynamic MR Angiography in Cerebral Aneurysms after Treatment with Platinum Detachable Coils.

Hayashi T, Asai J, Sugimoto H, Honda M, Satoh K, Nagashima G Interv Neuroradiol. 2010; 7(Suppl 1):65-72.

PMID: 20663381 PMC: 3627251. DOI: 10.1177/15910199010070S110.


ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Hundley W, Bluemke D, Finn J, Flamm S, Fogel M, Friedrich M J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(23):2614-62.

PMID: 20513610 PMC: 3042771. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011.


ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Hundley W, Bluemke D, Finn J, Flamm S, Fogel M, Friedrich M Circulation. 2010; 121(22):2462-508.

PMID: 20479157 PMC: 3034132. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d44a8f.


MR angiographic evaluation is limited in intracranial aneurysms embolized with Nexus coils.

Kang H, Moon W, Roh H, Han M, Choe W, Cho J Neuroradiology. 2007; 50(2):171-8.

PMID: 17960372 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0320-3.


References
1.
NEW P, Rosen B, Brady T, Buonanno F, Kistler J, Burt C . Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology. 1983; 147(1):139-48. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.147.1.6828719. View

2.
Teitelbaum G, Ortega H, Vinitski S, Stern H, Tsuruda J, Mitchell D . Low-artifact intravascular devices: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1988; 168(3):713-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406402. View

3.
Teitelbaum G, Raney M, Carvlin M, Matsumoto A, Barth K . Evaluation of ferromagnetism and magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of the Strecker tantalum vascular stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1989; 12(3):125-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02577374. View

4.
Bernardino M, Steinberg H, Pearson T, Torres W, Henderson J . Shunts for portal hypertension: MR and angiography for determination of patency. Radiology. 1986; 158(1):57-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940398. View

5.
Liebman C, Messersmith R, Levin D, Lu C . MR imaging of inferior vena caval filters: safety and artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 150(5):1174-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.5.1174. View