» Articles » PMID: 18781368

Cementless Femoral Prostheses Cost More to Implant Than Cemented Femoral Prostheses

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Sep 11
PMID 18781368
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Prosthetic cost contributes greatly to the overall expense of THA. A key question, therefore, in the selection of implant technique is whether any price difference exists between a cementless and a cemented femoral prosthesis. We evaluated the price difference between the most commonly used cemented and cementless femoral stems at three high-volume academic medical centers. Each hospital's costs for prostheses from the manufacturers were recorded. The average cost of implanting a cementless femoral prosthesis was $296 more than the average cost of implanting a cemented femoral stem, even with the additional expense of two batches of bone cement and the accessories commonly used to achieve a third-generation cementing technique. The price difference was less variable if the cost of the prostheses from only the primary implant supplier for each institution was considered. As the number of THAs performed per year continues to escalate, implantation of a cemented femoral component remains an attractive method of fixation from an economic standpoint.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, economic and decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

UNCEMENTED HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: REVISION RATE, REVISION RISK FACTORS, AND REVISION CAUSE.

cimic M, cimic K, Bohacek I, Plecko M, Delimar D Acta Clin Croat. 2025; 62(4):652-658.

PMID: 39866767 PMC: 11759117. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.04.10.


Prediction of implant failure risk due to periprosthetic femoral fracture after primary elective total hip arthroplasty : a simplified and validated model based on 154,519 total hip arthroplasties from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Alagha M, Cobb J, Liddle A, Malchau H, Rolfson O, Mohaddes M Bone Joint Res. 2025; 14(1):46-57.

PMID: 39848279 PMC: 11756933. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0134.R1.


Conversion THA With Concomitant Removal of Orthopaedic Hardware Should Be Reclassified as a Revision Surgery in the Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group Coding Scheme: An Analysis of Cost and Resource Use.

Blackburn C, Chen K, Du J, Marcus R Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023; 482(5):790-800.

PMID: 37851410 PMC: 11008651. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002894.


Improved Biological Responses of Titanium Coating Using Laser-Aided Direct Metal Fabrication on SUS316L Stainless Steel.

Kim T, Lee S, Jo W, Kim Y, Kim S, Kwon S Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(14).

PMID: 34300866 PMC: 8305544. DOI: 10.3390/ma14143947.


Distal femoral replacement - Cemented or cementless? Current concepts and review of the literature.

Christ A, Hornicek F, Fabbri N J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 19:11-16.

PMID: 34040980 PMC: 8138588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.032.


References
1.
Lavernia C, Guzman J . Relationship of surgical volume to short-term mortality, morbidity, and hospital charges in arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(2):133-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80119-6. View

2.
Sarmiento A, Latta L . A radiographic review of 135 total hip Charnley arthroplasties followed between 15 and 35 years. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006; 73(3):145-50. View

3.
MURPHY S, Tannast M . [Conventional vs minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study of rehabilitation and complications]. Orthopade. 2006; 35(7):761-4, 766-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0969-z. View

4.
Klapach A, Callaghan J, Goetz D, Olejniczak J, Johnston R . Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved cementing techniques: a minimum twenty-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(12):1840-8. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00012. View

5.
Barrack R, Mulroy Jr R, Harris W . Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(3):385-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587883. View