Importance of Hospital Volume in the Overall Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Overview

Journal Ann Surg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 1998 Sep 22

PMID 9742926

Citations 153

Authors

J A Sosa

H M BOWMAN

T A Gordon

E B Bass

C J Yeo

K D Lillemoe

H A Pitt

J M Tielsch

J L Cameron

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether hospital volume is associated with clinical and economic outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or endoscopic or percutaneous stent procedures in Maryland between 1990 and 1995.

Summary Background Data: Previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients undergoing a Whipple procedure improve with higher surgical volume, but only 20% to 35% of patients with pancreatic cancer qualify for curative resection. Most patients undergo palliative procedures instead with a surgical bypass or biliary stent.

Methods: Analysis of hospital discharge data from all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland identified all patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent a pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or stent procedure between 1990 and 1995. Hospitals (n = 48) were categorized as high-, medium-, and low-volume providers according to their average annual volume of these procedures. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay, and hospital charges, after adjusting for differences in case mix and surgeon volume.

Results: Increased hospital volume is associated with markedly decreased in-hospital mortality rates and a decreased or similar length of stay for all three types of procedures and with decreased or similar hospital charges for resections and stents. After adjustment for case mix differences, the relative risk (RR) of in-hospital death after pancreatic resection was 19.3 and 8 at the low- and medium-volume hospitals, respectively, versus the high-volume hospital; after bypasses, the RR of death was 2.7 and 1.9, respectively; and after stents, the RR was 4.3 and 4.8, respectively.

Conclusions: Patients with pancreatic cancer who are to be treated with curative or palliative procedures appear to benefit from referral to a high-volume provider.

Citing Articles

Whipple's procedure for pancreatic cancer: training and the hospital environment are more important than volume alone.

Cawich S, Cabral R, Douglas J, Thomas D, Mohammed F, Naraynsingh V Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 14():100211.

PMID: 39845848 PMC: 11749909. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100211.

Routine frozen section during pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve value-based care.

Uppal A, Christopher W, Nguyen T, Vuong B, Stern S, Mejia J Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 10():100090.

PMID: 39845605 PMC: 11750023. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100090.

The role of surgeon and hospital volume in optimizing adrenal surgery outcomes.

Ghandour R, Najah H Gland Surg. 2024; 13(11):1891-1893.

PMID: 39678422 PMC: 11635554. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-383.

The impact of facility type on surgical outcomes in colon cancer patients: analysis of the national cancer database.

Shustak A, Horesh N, Emile S, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Salama E Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(12):7503-7511.

PMID: 39271506 PMC: 11615116. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11230-x.

The Practice of Pancreatoduodenectomy in India: A Nation-Wide Survey.

Kaushal G, Rakesh N, Mathew A, Sanyal S, Agrawal A, Dhar P Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41828.

PMID: 37575744 PMC: 10423016. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41828.

References

Luft H, Bunker J, Enthoven A . Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301(25):1364-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503. View

Yeo C, Cameron J, Sohn T, Lillemoe K, Pitt H, Talamini M . Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(3):248-57; discussion 257-60. PMC: 1191017. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004. View

Flood A, Scott W, Ewy W . Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories. Med Care. 1984; 22(2):98-114. View

Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

Hannan E, ODonnell J, Kilburn Jr H, Bernard H, Yazici A . Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989; 262(4):503-10. View

Watanapa P, Williamson R . Surgical palliation for pancreatic cancer: developments during the past two decades. Br J Surg. 1992; 79(1):8-20. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800790105. View

Iezzoni L, Foley S, Daley J, Hughes J, Fisher E, Heeren T . Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?. JAMA. 1992; 267(16):2197-203. DOI: 10.1001/jama.267.16.2197. View

Lillemoe K, Sauter P, Pitt H, Yeo C, Cameron J . Current status of surgical palliation of periampullary carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993; 176(1):1-10. View

Lillemoe K, Cameron J, KAUFMAN H, Yeo C, Pitt H, Sauter P . Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1993; 217(5):447-55; discussion 456-7. PMC: 1242819. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199305010-00004. View

10.

Jollis J, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong E, Pryor D, Muhlbaier L, Mark D . Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119(8):844-50. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00011. View

11.

Romano P, Roos L, Jollis J . Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46(10):1075-9; discussion 1081-90. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8. View

12.

Steiner C, Bass E, Talamini M, Pitt H, Steinberg E . Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330(6):403-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300607. View

13.

Ballard D, Bryant S, OBrien P, Smith D, PINE M, Cortese D . Referral selection bias in the Medicare hospital mortality prediction model: are centers of referral for Medicare beneficiaries necessarily centers of excellence?. Health Serv Res. 1994; 28(6):771-84. PMC: 1069980. View

14.

Jollis J, Peterson E, DeLong E, Mark D, Collins S, Muhlbaier L . The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(24):1625-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199412153312406. View

15.

Gordon T, Burleyson G, Tielsch J, Cameron J . The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(1):43-9. PMC: 1234493. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00005. View

16.

Wade T, Virgo K, Johnson F . The Whipple resection for cancer in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(3):241-8. PMC: 1234565. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199503000-00005. View

17.

Yeo C, Cameron J, Lillemoe K, Sitzmann J, Hruban R, Goodman S . Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(6):721-31; discussion 731-3. PMC: 1234702. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00011. View

18.

Lieberman M, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan M . Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995; 222(5):638-45. PMC: 1234991. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00006. View

19.

Holbrook R, Hargrave K, Traverso L . A prospective cost analysis of pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 1996; 171(5):508-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00016-5. View

20.

Luft H . The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care. 1980; 18(9):940-59. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198009000-00006. View