» Articles » PMID: 18698344

Noise-driven Stem Cell and Progenitor Population Dynamics

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2008 Aug 14
PMID 18698344
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The balance between maintenance of the stem cell state and terminal differentiation is influenced by the cellular environment. The switching between these states has long been understood as a transition between attractor states of a molecular network. Herein, stochastic fluctuations are either suppressed or can trigger the transition, but they do not actually determine the attractor states.

Methodology/principal Findings: We present a novel mathematical concept in which stem cell and progenitor population dynamics are described as a probabilistic process that arises from cell proliferation and small fluctuations in the state of differentiation. These state fluctuations reflect random transitions between different activation patterns of the underlying regulatory network. Importantly, the associated noise amplitudes are state-dependent and set by the environment. Their variability determines the attractor states, and thus actually governs population dynamics. This model quantitatively reproduces the observed dynamics of differentiation and dedifferentiation in promyelocytic precursor cells.

Conclusions/significance: Consequently, state-specific noise modulation by external signals can be instrumental in controlling stem cell and progenitor population dynamics. We propose follow-up experiments for quantifying the imprinting influence of the environment on cellular noise regulation.

Citing Articles

Revisiting Epithelial Carcinogenesis.

Mendez-Lopez L Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(13).

PMID: 35806442 PMC: 9267463. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137437.


A noble extended stochastic logistic model for cell proliferation with density-dependent parameters.

Roy T, Ghosh S, Saha B, Bhattacharya S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8998.

PMID: 35637247 PMC: 9151920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12719-y.


A stochastic model of homeostasis: The roles of noise and nuclear positioning in deciding cell fate.

Jangid A, Selvarajan S, Ramaswamy R iScience. 2021; 24(10):103199.

PMID: 34703995 PMC: 8524154. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103199.


Modeling cell population dynamics.

Charlebois D, Balazsi G In Silico Biol. 2018; 13(1-2):21-39.

PMID: 30562900 PMC: 6598210. DOI: 10.3233/ISB-180470.


Signalling and differentiation in emulsion-based multi-compartmentalized in vitro gene circuits.

Dupin A, Simmel F Nat Chem. 2018; 11(1):32-39.

PMID: 30478365 PMC: 6298583. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-018-0174-9.


References
1.
Wang J, Huang B, Xia X, Sun Z . Funneled landscape leads to robustness of cell networks: yeast cell cycle. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006; 2(11):e147. PMC: 1636676. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020147. View

2.
Lecuyer E, Yoshida H, Parthasarathy N, Alm C, Babak T, Cerovina T . Global analysis of mRNA localization reveals a prominent role in organizing cellular architecture and function. Cell. 2007; 131(1):174-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.003. View

3.
Beckmann J, Scheitza S, Wernet P, Fischer J, Giebel B . Asymmetric cell division within the human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell compartment: identification of asymmetrically segregating proteins. Blood. 2007; 109(12):5494-501. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-11-055921. View

4.
Chang H, Hemberg M, Barahona M, Ingber D, Huang S . Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature. 2008; 453(7194):544-7. PMC: 5546414. DOI: 10.1038/nature06965. View

5.
Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle 3rd F, Doyle J . Robustness of cellular functions. Cell. 2004; 118(6):675-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008. View