Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity of Cervical Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Previous research has shown that the intertumoral maximum standardized uptake value (SUVMax) of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) for cervical cancer predicts disease outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pretreatment intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity of FDG.
Experimental Design: This is a prospective cohort study of 72 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages Ib1 to IVa cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation. Three-dimensional FDG-PET threshold tumor volumes were calculated using image segmentation and an adaptive thresholding method for the primary cervix tumor from the pretreatment FDG-PET/computerized tomography. Intratumor heterogeneity was obtained for each patient's cervical tumor by taking the derivative (dV/dT) of the volume-threshold function from 40% to 80%. The association between intratumoral heterogeneity and tumor-specific factors and patient outcomes were determined.
Results: The mean cervix tumor SUV(Max) was 12.4 (range, 3.0-38.4). The mean differential tumor heterogeneity was -1.074 (range, -0.107 to -5.623). There was no association between dV/dT and SUVMax (R2 = 0.069), but there was a relationship with dV/dT and tumor volume (R2 = 0.881). There was no correlation of dV/dT with tumor histology (P = 0.4905). Heterogeneity was significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis at diagnosis (P = 0.0009), tumor response to radiation as evaluated by FDG-PET obtained 3 months after completing treatment (P = 0.0207), risk of pelvic recurrence (P = 0.0017), and progression-free survival (P = 0.03).
Conclusions: Cervical intratumoral FDG metabolic heterogeneity on the pretreatment FDG-PET predicts risk of lymph node involvement at diagnosis, response to therapy, and risk of pelvic recurrence.
Ikeda D, Oura M, Uehara A, Tabata R, Narita K, Takeuchi M Haematologica. 2024; 109(9):2822-2832.
PMID: 38572548 PMC: 11367203. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285038.
Current Update on PET/MRI in Gynecological Malignancies-A Review of the Literature.
Virarkar M, Vulasala S, Calimano-Ramirez L, Singh A, Lall C, Bhosale P Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(1):1077-1105.
PMID: 36661732 PMC: 9858166. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010083.
Gong C, Liu C, Tao Z, Zhang J, Wang L, Cao J Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).
PMID: 36010967 PMC: 9406192. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163973.
Gynecologic Cancer, Cancer Stem Cells, and Possible Targeted Therapies.
Keyvani V, Riahi E, Yousefi M, Esmaeili S, Shafabakhsh R, Hasan-Abad A Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:823572.
PMID: 35250573 PMC: 8888850. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.823572.
Pedraza S, Seiffert A, Sarandeses P, Munoz-Lopez B, Gomez E, Sanchez-Gonzalez P Strahlenther Onkol. 2022; 198(9):792-801.
PMID: 35072751 PMC: 9402502. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01900-x.