» Articles » PMID: 18693944

Critical Issues in an Electronic Documentation System

Overview
Date 2008 Aug 13
PMID 18693944
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA), of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs has instituted a medical record (EMR) that includes electronic documentation of all narrative components of the medical record. To support clinicians using the system, multiple efforts have been instituted to ease the creation of narrative reports. Although electronic documentation is easier to read and improves access to information, it also may create new and additional hazards for users. This study is the first step in a series of studies to evaluate the issues surrounding the creation and use of electronic documentation. Eighty-eight providers across multiple clinical roles were interviewed in 10 primary care sites in the VA system. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed for themes. In addition, specific questions were asked about perceived harm due to electronic documentation practices. Five themes relating to difficulties with electronic documentation were identified: 1) information overload; 2) hidden information; 3) lack of trust; 4) communication; 5) decision-making. Three providers reported that they knew of an incident where current documentation practices had caused patient harm and over 75% of respondents reported significant mis-trust of the system.

Citing Articles

The Future of Critical Care: Optimizing Technologies and a Learning Healthcare System to Potentiate a More Humanistic Approach to Critical Care.

Meissen H, Gong M, Wong A, Zimmerman J, Nadkarni N, Kane-Gil S Crit Care Explor. 2022; 4(3):e0659.

PMID: 35308462 PMC: 8926065. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000659.


Feeling and thinking: can theories of human motivation explain how EHR design impacts clinician burnout?.

Weir C, Taber P, Taft T, Reese T, Jones B, Del Fiol G J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 28(5):1042-1046.

PMID: 33179026 PMC: 8068417. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa270.


Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wright M, Borbolla D, Waller R, Del Fiol G, Reese T, Nesbitt P J Biomed Inform X. 2019; 3.

PMID: 31423485 PMC: 6696941. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041.


What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.

Weir C, Staes C, Slager S, Taft T, Chidambaram V, Kramer H AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018; 2017:1764-1772.

PMID: 29854247 PMC: 5977632.


Toward Designing Information Display to Support Critical Care. A Qualitative Contextual Evaluation and Visioning Effort.

Wright M, Dunbar S, Macpherson B, Moretti E, Del Fiol G, Bolte J Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(4):912-929.

PMID: 27704138 PMC: 5228134. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-03-RA-0033.


References
1.
Tang P, LaRosa M, Gorden S . Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999; 6(3):245-51. PMC: 61364. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060245. View

2.
Hammond K, Helbig S, Benson C, Brathwaite-Sketoe B . Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :269-73. PMC: 1480345. View

3.
Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, Stavri P, Lyman J, Fournier L . Perceptions of physician order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42(4):313-23. View

4.
Berg M, Langenberg C, vd Berg I, Kwakkernaat J . Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int J Med Inform. 1998; 52(1-3):243-51. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00143-9. View

5.
Embi P, Yackel T, Logan J, Bowen J, Cooney T, Gorman P . Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(4):300-9. PMC: 436079. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1525. View