» Articles » PMID: 15064287

Impacts of Computerized Physician Documentation in a Teaching Hospital: Perceptions of Faculty and Resident Physicians

Overview
Date 2004 Apr 6
PMID 15064287
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Computerized physician documentation (CPD) has been implemented throughout the nation's Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and is likely to increasingly replace handwritten documentation in other institutions. The use of this technology may affect educational and clinical activities, yet little has been reported in this regard. The authors conducted a qualitative study to determine the perceived impacts of CPD among faculty and housestaff in a VAMC.

Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using semistructured interviews with faculty (n = 10) and a group interview with residents (n = 10) at a VAMC teaching hospital.

Measurements: Content analysis of field notes and taped transcripts were done by two independent reviewers using a grounded theory approach. Findings were validated using member checking and peer debriefing.

Results: Four major themes were identified: (1) improved availability of documentation; (2) changes in work processes and communication; (3) alterations in document structure and content; and (4) mistakes, concerns, and decreased confidence in the data. With a few exceptions, subjects felt documentation was more available, with benefits for education and patient care. Other impacts of CPD were largely seen as detrimental to aspects of clinical practice and education, including documentation quality, workflow, professional communication, and patient care.

Conclusion: CPD is perceived to have substantial positive and negative impacts on clinical and educational activities and environments. Care should be taken when designing, implementing, and using such systems to avoid or minimize any harmful impacts. More research is needed to assess the extent of the impacts identified and to determine the best strategies to effectively deal with them.

Citing Articles

Going paperless - Qualitative monitoring of staff morale during the transition from paper to electronic health records.

Baniulyte G, Rogerson N, Bowden J Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20645.

PMID: 37867851 PMC: 10585231. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20645.


Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology.

Salahuddin L, Ismail Z, Abdul Rahim F, Anawar S, Hashim U Appl Clin Inform. 2023; 14(4):693-704.

PMID: 37648223 PMC: 10468731. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771394.


Electronic health records and clinical documentation in medical residency programs: preparing residents to become master clinicians.

Anderson C, Kaul M, Gullapalli N, Pitani S J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(12):1965-1972.

PMID: 37573135 PMC: 10654888. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad158.


The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Ebbers T, Kool R, Smeele L, Dirven R, den Besten C, Karssemakers L J Med Syst. 2022; 46(7):46.

PMID: 35618978 PMC: 9135789. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9.


Evaluation and comparison of errors on nursing notes created by online and offline speech recognition technology and handwritten: an interventional study.

Peivandi S, Ahmadian L, Farokhzadian J, Jahani Y BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):96.

PMID: 35395798 PMC: 8994328. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01835-4.


References
1.
Korst L, Eusebio-Angeja A, Chamorro T, Aydin C, Gregory K . Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. J Nurs Adm. 2003; 33(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200301000-00006. View

2.
Bates D, Boyle D, Teich J . Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; :996. PMC: 2247898. View

3.
Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland C . The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003; 326(7404):1439-43. PMC: 162256. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1439. View

4.
Menke J, Broner C, CAMPBELL D, McKissick M . Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001; 1:3. PMC: 57982. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-3. View

5.
Hammond K, Helbig S, Benson C, Brathwaite-Sketoe B . Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2004; :269-73. PMC: 1480345. View