» Articles » PMID: 18692296

Examination of Inertial Cavitation of Optison in Producing Sonoporation of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Aug 12
PMID 18692296
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this project was to elucidate the relationship between ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and sonoporation. Sonoporation is an ultrasound-induced, transient cell membrane permeability change that allows for the uptake of normally impermeable macromolecules. Specifically, this study will determine the role that inertial cavitation plays in eliciting sonoporation. The inertial cavitation thresholds of the UCA, Optison, are compared directly with the results of sonoporation to determine the involvement of inertial cavitation in sonoporation. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed as a monolayer in a solution of Optison, 500,000 Da fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC-dextran), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to 30 s of pulsed ultrasound at 3.15-MHz center frequency, 5-cycle pulse duration and 10-Hz pulse repetition frequency. The peak rarefactional pressure (P(r)) was varied over a range from 120 kPa-3.5 MPa, and five independent replicates were performed at each pressure. As the P(r) was increased, from 120 kPa-3.5 MPa, the fraction of sonoporated cells among the total viable population increased from 0.63-10.21%, with the maximum occurring at 2.4 MPa. The inertial cavitation threshold for Optison at these exposure conditions has previously been shown to be in the range 0.77-0.83 MPa, at which sonoporation activity was found to be 50% of its maximum level. Furthermore, significant sonoporation activity was observed at pressure levels below the threshold for inertial cavitation of Optison. Above 2.4 MPa, a significant drop in sonoporation activity occurred, corresponding to pressures where >95% of the Optison was collapsing. These results demonstrate that sonoporation is not directly a result of inertial cavitation of the UCA, rather that the effect is related to linear and/or nonlinear oscillation of the UCA occurring at pressure levels below the inertial cavitation threshold.

Citing Articles

Immunomodulation of human T cells by microbubble-mediated focused ultrasound.

Baez A, Singh D, He S, Hajiaghayi M, Gholizadeh F, Darlington P Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1486744.

PMID: 39502696 PMC: 11534865. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1486744.


Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery: Sonoporation Mechanisms, Biophysics, and Critical Factors.

Tu J, Yu A BME Front. 2023; 2022:9807347.

PMID: 37850169 PMC: 10521752. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9807347.


Landscape of Cellular Bioeffects Triggered by Ultrasound-Induced Sonoporation.

Przystupski D, Ussowicz M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19).

PMID: 36232532 PMC: 9569453. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911222.


Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Rich J, Tian Z, Huang T Adv Mater Technol. 2022; 7(1).

PMID: 35399914 PMC: 8992730. DOI: 10.1002/admt.202100885.


The cellular response to plasma membrane disruption for nanomaterial delivery.

Houthaeve G, De Smedt S, Braeckmans K, De Vos W Nano Converg. 2022; 9(1):6.

PMID: 35103909 PMC: 8807741. DOI: 10.1186/s40580-022-00298-7.


References
1.
Hwang J, Brayman A, Reidy M, Matula T, Kimmey M, Crum L . Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31(4):553-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.014. View

2.
Lai C, Wu C, Chen C, Li P . Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32(12):1931-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.06.020. View

3.
Guzman H, Nguyen D, Khan S, Prausnitz M . Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 110(1):588-96. DOI: 10.1121/1.1376131. View

4.
Hallow D, Mahajan A, McCutchen T, Prausnitz M . Measurement and correlation of acoustic cavitation with cellular bioeffects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32(7):1111-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.008. View

5.
Weimann L, Wu J . Transdermal delivery of poly-l-lysine by sonomacroporation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28(9):1173-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00571-9. View