» Articles » PMID: 18683464

The Nature of Discrimination Learning in Pigeons

Overview
Journal Learn Behav
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Aug 8
PMID 18683464
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The results from five experiments are considered in relation to two of Spence's (1937, 1938) proposals concerning discrimination learning. In Experiments 1 and 2, we investigated whether his ideas about the interaction between excitatory and inhibitory generalization gradients can be used to understand how animals solve a complex patterning discrimination. The results supported a development of his proposals as put forward by Pearce (1994), provided a modification was made to Pearce's rulefor determining the shape ofthe generalization gradient. In Experiments 3, 4, and 5, we examined whether animals would pay more attention to stimuli that are relevant, rather than irrelevant, to the solution of a discrimination. The results supported this proposal for stimuli comprising visual patterns, but not for those comprising plain colors. The results also indicated that change of attention was a consequence of preliminary receptor-exposure acts, as envisaged by Spence, and not of more central changes in attention.

Citing Articles

Aversive outcomes impact human olfactory discrimination learning and generalization.

Porter D, Qu L, Kahnt T, Gottfried J Behav Neurosci. 2021; 135(5):642-653.

PMID: 34197137 PMC: 8478780. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000476.


Dimensions of Animal Consciousness.

Birch J, Schnell A, Clayton N Trends Cogn Sci. 2020; 24(10):789-801.

PMID: 32830051 PMC: 7116194. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.007.


Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.

ODonoghue E, Broschard M, Wasserman E J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020; 46(2):107-123.

PMID: 31916780 PMC: 8753651. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000234.


The role of category density in pigeons' tracking of relevant information.

Sheridan C, Castro L, Fonseca S, Wasserman E Learn Behav. 2019; 47(3):234-244.

PMID: 30719680 PMC: 6679816. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-019-00372-x.


Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Qadri M, Ashby F, Smith J, Cook R Cognition. 2018; 183:256-268.

PMID: 30508704 PMC: 6322971. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011.


References
1.
WAGNER A, Logan F, Haberlandt K, Price T . Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol. 1968; 76(2):171-80. DOI: 10.1037/h0025414. View

2.
Pearce J, Hall G . A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol Rev. 1980; 87(6):532-52. View

3.
Couvillon P, Tennant W, Bitterman M . Intradimensional vs. extradimensional transfer in the discriminative learning of goldfish and pigeons. Anim Learn Behav. 1976; 4(2):197-203. DOI: 10.3758/bf03214035. View

4.
LAWRENCE D . Acquired distinctiveness of cues; transfer between discrimination on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1949; 39(6):770-84. DOI: 10.1037/h0058097. View

5.
LAWRENCE D . Acquired distinctiveness of cues: selective association in a constant stimulus situation. J Exp Psychol. 1950; 40(2):175-88. DOI: 10.1037/h0063217. View