» Articles » PMID: 22981878

Implicit and Explicit Categorization: a Tale of Four Species

Overview
Date 2012 Sep 18
PMID 22981878
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Categorization is essential for survival, and it is a widely studied cognitive adaptation in humans and animals. An influential neuroscience perspective differentiates in humans an explicit, rule-based categorization system from an implicit system that slowly associates response outputs to different regions of perceptual space. This perspective is being extended to study categorization in other vertebrate species, using category tasks that have a one-dimensional, rule-based solution or a two-dimensional, information-integration solution. Humans, macaques, and capuchin monkeys strongly dimensionalize perceptual stimuli and learn rule-based tasks more quickly. In sharp contrast, pigeons learn these two tasks equally quickly. Pigeons represent a cognitive system in which the commitment to dimensional analysis and category rules was not strongly made. Their results may reveal the character of the ancestral vertebrate categorization system from which that of primates emerged. The primate results establish continuity with human cognition, suggesting that nonhuman primates share aspects of humans' capacity for explicit cognition. The emergence of dimensional analysis and rule learning could have been an important step in primates' cognitive evolution.

Citing Articles

Simplified Visual Stimuli Impair Retrieval and Transfer in Audiovisual Equivalence Learning Tasks.

Tot K, Eordegh G, Harcsa-Pinter N, Bodosi B, Keri S, Kiss A Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70339.

PMID: 39972938 PMC: 11839764. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70339.


Dissociable Roles of the Dorsolateral and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Human Categorization.

Broschard M, Turner B, Tranel D, Freeman J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(34).

PMID: 38997159 PMC: 11340282. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2343-23.2024.


The Pigeon as a Model of Complex Visual Processing and Category Learning.

Wasserman E, Turner B, Gunturkun O Neurosci Insights. 2024; 19:26331055241235918.

PMID: 38425669 PMC: 10903219. DOI: 10.1177/26331055241235918.


A developmental account of the role of sequential dependencies in typical and atypical language learners.

Goffman L, Gerken L Cogn Neuropsychol. 2023; 40(5-6):243-264.

PMID: 37963089 PMC: 10939949. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2275837.


The pigeon as a machine: Complex category structures can be acquired by a simple associative model.

Turner B, Wasserman E iScience. 2023; 26(10):107998.

PMID: 37854695 PMC: 10579431. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107998.


References
1.
Smith J, Beran M, Crossley M, Boomer J, Ashby F . Implicit and explicit category learning by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010; 36(1):54-65. PMC: 2841782. DOI: 10.1037/a0015892. View

2.
Katz J, Wright A, Bachevalier J . Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002; 28(4):358-68. View

3.
Kennedy E, Fragaszy D . Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol. 2008; 122(2):167-75. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167. View

4.
Ashby F, Ell S . The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001; 5(5):204-210. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01624-7. View

5.
Kemler D . The ability for dimensional analysis in preschool and retarded children: evidence from comparison, conservation, and prediction tasks. J Exp Child Psychol. 1982; 34(3):469-89. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90072-8. View